CVE-2015-9346
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe cp-polls plugin before 1.0.5 for WordPress has XSS.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe cp-polls WordPress plugin before version 1.0.5 contains a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through the plugin's input fields, potentially compromising user sessions or performing actions on behalf of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the cp-polls plugin directoryCheck your WordPress installation under wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named 'cp-polls' or 'codepeople-polls'. If the folder exists, the plugin is installed.Affected if The plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/
-
Find the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (usually cp-polls.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and look for a version comment or variable at the top of the file. Alternatively, check the plugin header in the main PHP file for 'Version:' field.Affected if The version found is lower than 1.0.5 (for example: 1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2, etc.)
-
Verify the plugin is activeLog in to WordPress admin and go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Check if 'Codepeople Polls' or 'cp-polls' shows as 'Active'.Affected if The plugin is installed, active, and the version is below 1.0.5
-
Check for XSS-susceptible input formsIf the plugin is active, navigate to the polls created with this plugin in the frontend. Look for poll submission forms where user input is accepted. These are the areas where XSS could be triggered.Affected if The plugin is active and below version 1.0.5, and poll forms are accessible on the site
You are affected if the Codepeople Polls cp-polls plugin is installed with a version lower than 1.0.5 and the plugin is active on your WordPress site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.0.5
Update the cp-polls plugin to version 1.0.5 or later. If immediate updating is not possible, consider disabling the plugin until the patch can be applied.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9346 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9346 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data