VernissageWordPress extension · Vernissage Project

CVE-2015-9477

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Vernissage theme 1.2.8 for WordPress has insufficient restrictions on option updates.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Vernissage theme 1.2.8 for WordPress contains an authorization flaw where the theme's option update functionality lacks proper capability checks, allowing authenticated users with low privileges (such as subscribers) to modify theme settings that should require administrator-level access.

MitigationUpdate to a patched version of the Vernissage theme that includes proper authorization checks for option updates, or remove/disable the vulnerable theme if no update is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
VernissageWordPress extension
Affected:= 1.2.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Vernissage theme is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Appearance > Themes, or inspect the /wp-content/themes/ directory for a folder named 'vernissage' or similar
    Affected if The Vernissage theme folder exists in the WordPress themes directory
  2. Verify the installed theme version
    Check the theme's style.css file in the theme folder for the 'Version:' header, or look in WordPress admin under Appearance > Themes > Theme Details
    Affected if The version is 1.2.8 exactly (or if the version cannot be determined and the theme appears to be Vernissage)
  3. Confirm WordPress user roles exist
    Check WordPress users list at Users > All Users in admin, or query the wp_users and wp_usermeta tables in the database
    Affected if There are user accounts with 'Subscriber' role or other low-privilege roles enabled on the site
  4. Check if theme options functionality is accessible
    Attempt to access theme options page (typically at /wp-admin/themes.php?page=theme_options or similar), or inspect the theme's PHP files for option update handlers (look for 'update_option' or 'theme_options' in theme files)
    Affected if The theme provides an options/settings page that can be accessed by authenticated users
  5. Check authentication settings
    Review WordPress site settings at Settings > General > Membership, or check if anyone can register (Settings > General > Membership: 'Anyone can register' is checked)
    Affected if The site allows user registration or has subscriber-level accounts active

Your environment is affected if the Vernissage theme version 1.2.8 is installed and active, with any authenticated user accounts (especially subscribers or users with low privileges) able to access the site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to a patched version of the Vernissage theme that includes proper authorization checks for option updates, or remove/disable the vulnerable theme if no update is available.

Fix this in Vernissage Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9477 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data