Wps Hide LoginWordPress extension · Wpserveur

CVE-2015-9498

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The wps-hide-login plugin before 1.1 for WordPress has CSRF that affects saving an option value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The wps-hide-login WordPress plugin before version 1.1 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) that allows attackers to forge administrator requests to save or modify plugin option values. The lack of anti-CSRF tokens in the options form and handler enables authenticated administrators to be tricked into unknowingly changing settings.

MitigationUpdate wps-hide-login plugin to version 1.1 or later which implements proper nonce verification. As an interim measure, ensure administrators are not browsing untrusted sites while authenticated and consider implementing additional request validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wps Hide LoginWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate wps-hide-login plugin installation
    Check the wp-content/plugins directory for the wps-hide-login folder, or query the WordPress database plugins table for the plugin entry.
    Affected if The plugin folder or database entry does not exist, meaning the plugin is not installed.
  2. Confirm plugin version number
    Open the main plugin PHP file (typically wps-hide-login/wps-hide-login.php) and locate the Version header in the plugin comment block, or check the WordPress plugins admin page for the installed version.
    Affected if The displayed version is below 1.1 (for example, 1.0.x or earlier).
  3. Verify plugin is active
    Check the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins to confirm wps-hide-login is activated, or query the wp_options table for the active_plugins option.
    Affected if The plugin is installed but not activated; CSRF requires an active configuration form to be exploitable.
  4. Inspect options form for nonce field
    Examine the plugin file that renders the settings form (commonly in admin settings pages) and search for a wp_nonce_field() call or similar nonce verification within the form output.
    Affected if The form markup contains no _wpnonce or similar hidden token field, indicating missing CSRF protection.
  5. Inspect options handler for nonce verification
    Review the PHP code that processes the form submission (the handler function) and look for wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() calls before saving options.
    Affected if The handler lacks nonce verification logic, meaning any request can modify settings without validation.

If the installed wps-hide-login version is below 1.1 and the plugin is active with the settings form lacking nonce verification, the environment is affected by this CSRF vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1 or later
Fixed in 1.1
Interim mitigation

Update wps-hide-login plugin to version 1.1 or later which implements proper nonce verification. As an interim measure, ensure administrators are not browsing untrusted sites while authenticated and consider implementing additional request validation.

Fix this in Wps Hide Login Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9498 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9498 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data