CVE-2015-9513
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Easy Digital Downloads (EDD) Favorites extension for WordPress, as used with EDD 1.8.x before 1.8.7, 1.9.x before 1.9.10, 2.0.x before 2.0.5, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, 2.2.x before 2.2.9, and 2.3.x before 2.3.7, has XSS because add_query_arg is misused.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Easy Digital Downloads Favorites extension caused by misuse of the WordPress add_query_arg function, which fails to properly sanitize or escape user input when constructing URLs, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.8, < 1.8.7>= 1.9, < 1.9.10>= 2.0, < 2.0.5>= 2.1, < 2.1.11>= 2.2, < 2.2.9>= 2.3, < 2.3.7all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Easy Digital Downloads is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory or admin panel for 'Easy Digital Downloads' and note the installed version numberAffected if The plugin is installed and the version falls within any of these ranges: >=1.8 and <1.8.7; >=1.9 and <1.9.10; >=2.0 and <2.0.5; >=2.1 and <2.1.11; >=2.2 and <2.2.9; >=2.3 and <2.3.7
-
Confirm Favorites extension is activeCheck your WordPress plugins directory or admin panel for 'Easy Digital Downloads Favorites' or 'EDD Favorites' extensionAffected if The Favorites extension is installed and active alongside any vulnerable Easy Digital Downloads version
-
Identify plugin version fileLocate the main plugin file (commonly edd.php or easy-digital-downloads.php) in your wp-content/plugins directory and open it to read the version defined in the plugin header commentAffected if The version string does not match a patched version (1.8.7, 1.9.10, 2.0.5, 2.1.11, 2.2.9, 2.3.7 or later)
-
Check for vulnerable add_query_arg usageSearch the Favorites extension source code (typically in the includes or templates folders) for calls to add_query_arg function that do not use esc_url or esc_attr when outputting the resultAffected if Code uses add_query_arg without proper escaping functions on the returned URL before HTML output
You are affected if Easy Digital Downloads is installed at a version below the patched releases AND the Favorites extension is active, as the XSS vulnerability exists in how add_query_arg constructs URLs without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.8.71.9.102.0.5
Update to the patched versions (1.8.7, 1.9.10, 2.0.5, 2.1.11, 2.2.9, or 2.3.7 and later) or apply proper output escaping when using add_query_arg.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9513 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data