.net FrameworkApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2016-0033

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-02-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, and 4.6.1 does not prevent recursive compilation of XSLT transforms, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (performance degradation) via crafted XSLT data, aka ".NET Framework Stack Overflow Denial of Service Vulnerability."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The vulnerability exists in Microsoft .NET Framework's XSLT transformation engine, which fails to prevent recursive compilation of XSLT transforms. Remote attackers can exploit this by submitting specially crafted XSLT data, causing a stack overflow that leads to denial of service through performance degradation.

MitigationApply the relevant Microsoft security update (MS16-035) to all affected .NET Framework installations. Additionally, implement input validation to restrict or sanitize XSLT data from untrusted sources, and consider network-level filtering of XML/XSLT content where feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
.net FrameworkApplication
Affected:= 2.0= 3.5= 3.5.1= 4.5.2= 4.6= 4.6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed .NET Framework version
    Check the Windows Registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\Full (for .NET 4.x) or HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v2.0 for .NET 2.0/3.x. Use command: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\Full' /v Version
    Affected if The installed version matches 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, or for .NET 2.0/3.x versions check registry subkeys under v2.0 for version 2.0, 3.5, or 3.5.1
  2. Verify XSLT processing capability
    Check if System.Xml or System.Xml.Linq assemblies are loaded by the application. Review application code or dependencies for usage of XslCompiledTransform class or other XSLT processors.
    Affected if The application uses System.Xml.Xsl.XslCompiledTransform, System.Xml.Xsl.XslTransform, or other XSLT processing classes to transform XML data.
  3. Assess XSLT input source
    Review application endpoints or interfaces that accept XML or XSLT input. Check web services, file upload functionality, or configuration files that reference external XSLT stylesheets.
    Affected if The application accepts XML or XSLT content from untrusted sources, including user uploads, API requests, or external URL references without validation.
  4. Check for recursive XSLT processing patterns
    Analyze XSLT stylesheets for recursive template calls, include/import chains, or compute-intensive operations that could trigger deep recursion.
    Affected if The XSLT stylesheets contain recursive template references or complex transformations that could be exploited to cause excessive recursion.

The environment is affected if it runs any of the listed .NET Framework versions (2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1) AND processes untrusted XSLT content through the affected XSLT transformation engine.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Microsoft security update (MS16-035) to all affected .NET Framework installations. Additionally, implement input validation to restrict or sanitize XSLT data from untrusted sources, and consider network-level filtering of XML/XSLT content where feasible.

Fix this in .net Framework Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,120
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0033 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data