Tririga Application PlatformApplication · Ibm

CVE-2016-0300

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-02-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 3.3 before 3.3.2.6, 3.4 before 3.4.2.3, and 3.5 before 3.5.0.1 might allow remote attackers to access arbitrary JSP pages via vectors related to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 111412.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access arbitrary JSP pages through path manipulation. The lack of proper input sanitization in the affected versions permits directory traversal attacks, enabling unauthorized access to server-side JSP files.

MitigationApply the vendor patches (3.3.2.6, 3.4.2.3, 3.5.0.1 or later) to remediate the input validation vulnerability. As an interim control, deploy WAF rules to detect and block path traversal patterns in HTTP requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tririga Application PlatformApplication
Affected:= 3.3.0.0= 3.3.0.1= 3.3.0.2= 3.3.1.0= 3.3.1.1= 3.3.1.2= 3.3.1.3= 3.3.2.0= 3.3.2.1= 3.3.2.3= 3.3.2.4= 3.3.2.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if IBM TRIRIGA is installed
    Check for TRIRIGA installation directories on the system, typically under the application server root (such as WebSphere or Tomcat) and look for tririga-related folders or the presence of tririga.war deployment artifacts.
    Affected if IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed TRIRIGA version
    Locate the version information file or check the TRIRIGA admin console for the installed platform version. The version is typically displayed in the About or System Information section of the administration interface.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 3.3.0.0, 3.3.0.1, 3.3.0.2, 3.3.1.0, 3.3.1.1, 3.3.1.2, 3.3.1.3, 3.3.2.0, 3.3.2.1, 3.3.2.3, 3.3.2.4, or 3.3.2.5
  3. Verify web interface accessibility
    Confirm that the TRIRIGA web application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS. This vulnerability is exploitable remotely through the web interface, so check if the application server hosting TRIRIGA is exposed via network access.
    Affected if The TRIRIGA web interface is network-accessible and the installed version is within the affected range
  4. Inspect HTTP request handling for path traversal
    Review the web application configuration and proxy settings to determine if incoming HTTP requests are being validated for path traversal patterns. Check if the application server or any intervening proxy performs input validation on URL paths.
    Affected if No path traversal validation is implemented on incoming HTTP requests and the version is affected

A user is affected if IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform version 3.3.0.0 through 3.3.2.5 is installed with its web interface accessible over the network without proper path traversal input validation in place.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patches (3.3.2.6, 3.4.2.3, 3.5.0.1 or later) to remediate the input validation vulnerability. As an interim control, deploy WAF rules to detect and block path traversal patterns in HTTP requests.

Fix this in Tririga Application Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0300 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data