Jazz Reporting ServiceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2016-0315

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-07-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Report Builder and Data Collection Component (DCC) in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 5.x before 5.0.2 ifix016 and 6.x before 6.0.1 ifix005 maintain session ID validity after a logout action, which allows remote authenticated users to hijack sessions by leveraging an unattended workstation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Jazz Reporting Service fails to invalidate session IDs upon logout in the Report Builder and Data Collection Component. This session management flaw allows an attacker with physical or remote access to an authenticated user's workstation to reuse the still-valid session identifier after the legitimate user logs out, enabling session hijacking.

MitigationApply IBM Jazz Reporting Service ifix016 for version 5.0.2 or ifix005 for version 6.0.1 to properly invalidate sessions upon logout. Until patches are applied, enforce strict session timeout policies and educate users about locking workstations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jazz Reporting ServiceApplication
Affected:= 5.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 6.0= 6.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Jazz Reporting Service version
    Check the installed version of IBM Jazz Reporting Service in the Jazz team server administration console or by inspecting the installed packages. This is typically found in the About section of the Jazz Reporting Service web interface or in the installation directory manifest.
    Affected if The installed version matches 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, or 6.0.1 from the affected versions list.
  2. Verify Report Builder is enabled
    Access the Jazz Reporting Service administration interface and check whether the Report Builder module is installed and active. This can be found in the component list or service status page of the Jazz Reporting Service administration console.
    Affected if The Report Builder component is enabled and running in the affected version.
  3. Verify Data Collection Component is enabled
    Access the Jazz Reporting Service administration interface and check whether the Data Collection Component is installed and active. This is typically listed in the component services or server status view.
    Affected if The Data Collection Component is enabled and running in the affected version.
  4. Review session timeout configuration
    Inspect the session management settings in the Jazz Reporting Service web.xml file or through the administration console. Look for session timeout values configured for the application.
    Affected if Session timeout is set to a long duration or is not configured, which would allow extended use of an invalidated session token.

You are affected if your installed IBM Jazz Reporting Service version is 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, or 6.0.1 AND either the Report Builder or Data Collection Component is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM Jazz Reporting Service ifix016 for version 5.0.2 or ifix005 for version 6.0.1 to properly invalidate sessions upon logout. Until patches are applied, enforce strict session timeout policies and educate users about locking workstations.

Fix this in Jazz Reporting Service Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0315 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data