ConnectionsApplication · Ibm

CVE-2016-0322

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Connections 4.0 through CR4, 4.5 through CR5, 5.0 through CR4, and 5.5 before CR1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by uploading an HTML document.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stored XSS vulnerability in IBM Connections allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript/HTML by uploading malicious HTML documents. When other users access these uploaded files, the embedded scripts execute in their browsers, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or defacement.

MitigationImplement Content-Disposition: attachment header for HTML uploads, or sanitize/sandbox HTML content before serving to prevent script execution. Apply the vendor patch (CR1 for v5.5 or later) if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConnectionsApplication
Affected:= 4.0.0.0= 4.5.0.0= 5.0.0.0= 5.5.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Connections version
    Check the product version through the IBM Connections administration console or by examining the version.info file in the installation directory. Common paths include /opt/IBM/Connections/version.info or through the wsadmin utility.
    Affected if The installed version matches 4.0.0.0, 4.5.0.0, 5.0.0.0, or 5.5.0.0, or any version within these release families.
  2. Confirm file upload functionality is enabled
    Verify whether the Files or Communities application, which handles document uploads, is enabled in your IBM Connections deployment. Check through the IBM Connections Administration console or via wsadmin commands.
    Affected if The Files or Communities application is enabled and permits users to upload files.
  3. Inspect HTTP response headers for HTML file serving
    Capture network traffic or examine server configuration when an HTML file is accessed. Check if the Content-Disposition header is set to 'attachment' for .html, .htm, or other HTML file types uploaded to the system.
    Affected if HTML files are served with Content-Type text/html (or no Content-Disposition header) rather than Content-Disposition: attachment, allowing the browser to render them.
  4. Review HTML content sanitization configuration
    Examine the IBM Connections configuration files (such as LotusConnections-config.xml) and any associated HTML sanitization or sandbox settings. Check if a sandboxing mechanism or HTML sanitizer is configured for uploaded content.
    Affected if No HTML sanitization, sandboxing, or content filtering is configured for uploaded HTML documents.
  5. Audit existing uploaded HTML documents
    Search the file repository or database for .html, .htm, or other HTML file extensions that may have been uploaded by users. Inspect their contents for suspicious script tags, iframes, or event handlers.
    Affected if Any HTML files exist in the system that contain embedded JavaScript, iframe tags, or other potentially malicious content.

You are affected if your IBM Connections version is 4.0.0.0, 4.5.0.0, 5.0.0.0, or 5.5.0.0, and HTML file uploads are permitted without Content-Disposition: attachment headers or HTML sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement Content-Disposition: attachment header for HTML uploads, or sanitize/sandbox HTML content before serving to prevent script execution. Apply the vendor patch (CR1 for v5.5 or later) if available.

Fix this in Connections Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0322 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data