CVE-2016-0529
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Interaction History component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, and 12.2.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to User GUI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0527, CVE-2016-0528, and CVE-2016-0530.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCVE-2016-0529 is an unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Customer Interaction History component of Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.1.1 through 12.2.5. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to impact confidentiality and integrity through the User GUI interface, likely via improper input handling or insufficient access controls in web-facing interfaces.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 12.1.3= 12.2.3= 12.2.4= 12.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oracle E-Business Suite installationQuery the database for E-Business Suite version information. Connect as APPS user and run: SELECT release_name FROM apps.fnd_product_groups; or check the context file $CONTEXT_FILE for the variable s_apps_version.Affected if The returned version matches any of: 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, or 12.2.5
-
Confirm Customer Interaction History component is installedQuery the database for installed Oracle modules: SELECT application_name, status FROM apps.fnd_application_vl WHERE application_name LIKE '%Customer Interaction%'; or check the modules installed via Oracle Applications Manager.Affected if The Customer Interaction History module shows status as 'I' (Installed) or 'S' (Shared); this indicates the vulnerable component is present in the environment.
-
Verify web interface is accessibleCheck if Oracle E-Business Suite web listeners (Oracle HTTP Server / Apache) are running and the /OA_HTML/ directory is accessible. Use: ps -ef | grep -i httpd or check Oracle WebLogic/OHS status. Attempt to access the login page at the E-Business Suite URL.Affected if The web interface is reachable from network locations, particularly untrusted ones, making the GUI-based vulnerability exploitable.
-
Check for Customer Interaction History responsibilityQuery for assigned responsibilities: SELECT responsibility_name FROM apps.fnd_responsibility_vl WHERE responsibility_name LIKE '%Customer Interaction%' OR responsibility_name LIKE '%Interaction History%';Affected if Users have assigned responsibilities that grant access to the Customer Interaction History function, enabling the attack vector through the User GUI interface.
You are affected if your Oracle E-Business Suite version is exactly 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, or 12.2.5 AND the Customer Interaction History component is installed AND users have access to it via the web GUI.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Updates (CPU) for Oracle E-Business Suite, specifically the January 2016 CPU which contains the fix for this vulnerability. Test thoroughly in a non-production environment before deploying to production systems.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0529 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0529 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data