CVE-2016-10139
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on BLU R1 HD devices with Shanghai Adups software. The two package names involved in the exfiltration are com.adups.fota and com.adups.fota.sysoper. In the com.adups.fota.sysoper app's AndroidManifest.xml file, it sets the android:sharedUserId attribute to a value of android.uid.system which makes it execute as the system user, which is a very privileged user on the device. Therefore, the app executing as the system user has been granted a number of powerful permissions even though they are not present in the com.adups.fota.sysoper app's AndroidManifest.xml file. This app provides the com.adups.fota app access to the user's call log, text messages, and various device identifiers through the com.adups.fota.sysoper.provider.InfoProvider component. The com.adups.fota app uses timestamps when it runs and is eligible to exfiltrate the user's PII every 72 hours. If 72 hours have passed since the value of the timestamp, then the exfiltration will be triggered by the user plugging in the device to charge or when they leave or enter a wireless network. The exfiltration occurs in the background without any user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA pre-installed system app (com.adups.fota.sysoper) on BLU R1 HD devices exploits android:sharedUserId="android.uid.system" to run with elevated system privileges, providing its companion app (com.adups.fota) unauthorized access to sensitive user data including call logs, text messages, and device identifiers via the InfoProvider component. The exfiltration triggers every 72 hours when the device is charged or connects to WiFi, transmitting PII in the background without user knowledge.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if the companion app com.adups.fota is installedUse a package manager to list installed packages and search for 'com.adups.fota' (e.g., 'pm list packages | grep adups.fota' or check via device management console)Affected if The package com.adups.fota exists on the device
-
Check if the system app com.adups.fota.sysoper is installedUse a package manager to list installed packages and search for 'com.adups.fota.sysoper' (e.g., 'pm list packages | grep adups.fota.sysoper')Affected if The package com.adups.fota.sysoper exists on the device
-
Verify if either app holds system-level privilegesInspect the AndroidManifest.xml of both apps for android:sharedUserId="android.uid.system" or check the app's assigned UID via 'dumpsys package <package_name>'Affected if Either app is configured with sharedUserId="android.uid.system" granting elevated system privileges
-
Confirm the InfoProvider component is present and exportedQuery the component info using 'dumpsys package com.adups.fota' or inspect the manifest for the InfoProvider content provider with android:exported="true"Affected if The InfoProvider content provider is defined and accessible to other apps
-
Check for suspicious periodic network behavior during charging or WiFi connectionMonitor network traffic or review firewall logs when device is charging or connects to WiFi; look for outbound connections to unknown destinations occurring on a 72-hour recurring scheduleAffected if Outbound PII transmission is observed periodically when device is charging or on WiFi without user-initiated action
If both com.adups.fota and com.adups.fota.sysoper are installed with system-level privileges and the InfoProvider is exposed, the device is affected by this vulnerability and user data is being exfiltrated.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemove or disable the com.adups.fota and com.adups.fota.sysoper applications via device administrator settings or MDM; if removal is not possible due to system-level installation, factory reset or reflash with patched firmware from the device manufacturer.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10139 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data