AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2016-10339

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-06-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In all Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, HLOS can overwite secure memory or read contents of the keystore.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in Android CAF (Code Aurora Forum) Linux kernel releases allows the High Level Operating System (HLOS/Android userspace) to bypass secure memory protections, enabling unauthorized overwriting of secure memory regions and unauthorized reading of keystore contents. This represents a critical failure in the TrustZone/TEE isolation boundaries.

MitigationApply CAF kernel security patches for affected Android releases. Verify secure memory isolation is enforced and keystore contents cannot be accessed from HLOS context.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CAF kernel usage
    Check /proc/version or 'uname -a' output for 'CAF' or 'Code Aurora Forum' in the kernel version string. CAF kernels are commonly used on Qualcomm Snapdragon devices.
    Affected if The device runs a CAF (Code Aurora Forum) kernel build, as only CAF kernels are affected by this vulnerability.
  2. Confirm TEE/TrustZone presence
    Check for TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) drivers by looking for tee device nodes: ls -la /dev/tee* or /dev/tz* 2>/dev/null. Also check /sys/class/misc/ for tee entries.
    Affected if A TEE/TrustZone implementation is present on the device, which is required for this isolation bypass to be relevant.
  3. Verify secure memory isolation
    Attempt to access TEE device files from a non-root userspace context. Check if /dev/tee0 or similar TEE device nodes exist and can be opened by non-privileged applications without proper authentication.
    Affected if Userspace applications can open TEE device nodes without proper secure world authentication, indicating the isolation boundary is bypassed.
  4. Check keystore accessibility
    Examine the keystore daemon (keymaster) and verify whether its memory contents or protected keys can be read from the HLOS (userspace) context. Look for any keystore data files or memory regions accessible from non-secure context.
    Affected if Keystore contents or protected cryptographic keys are readable or accessible from the Android userspace (HLOS) context, indicating TrustZone isolation failure.

A device is affected if it uses a CAF kernel with an active TEE/TrustZone implementation where the secure memory isolation between HLOS and the secure world can be bypassed from userspace, allowing unauthorized access to keystore contents.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply CAF kernel security patches for affected Android releases. Verify secure memory isolation is enforced and keystore contents cannot be accessed from HLOS context.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing24.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,520
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,232.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10339 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data