CVE-2016-1038
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.16, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30172, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.016.20039 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass JavaScript API execution restrictions via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-1039, CVE-2016-1040, CVE-2016-1041, CVE-2016-1042, CVE-2016-1044, CVE-2016-1062, and CVE-2016-1117.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a JavaScript API execution restriction bypass vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat on Windows and OS X. The flaw allows attackers to bypass built-in security restrictions that control which JavaScript APIs can be executed, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution or other malicious activities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.0.15<= 15.006.30121<= 15.010.20060<= 15.006.30121<= 15.010.20060<= 11.0.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe productOpen Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat, then go to Help > About Adobe Reader/Acrobat to see the exact product name and version number displayed in the About dialog windowAffected if The system has Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat installed (either the standalone Reader or the full Acrobat application)
-
Determine product variantCheck whether the installed product is Adobe Reader (standalone), Adobe Acrobat Standard/Pro, or Adobe Acrobat/Reader DC (Document Cloud) variant by reviewing the product name in the About dialog or installed programs listAffected if The product is Adobe Reader 11.x, Adobe Acrobat 11.x, or any DC (Document Cloud) variant of Acrobat or Reader
-
Check version for Classic products (11.x)On the About screen, note the version number (for example, 11.0.15). Compare this numeric version against the affected range: Adobe Reader <= 11.0.15 or Adobe Acrobat <= 11.0.15Affected if The installed version is 11.0.15 or any earlier 11.x release (for example, 11.0.14, 11.0.13, etc.)
-
Check version for DC Classic (15.x)On the About screen, note the full version number (for example, 15.006.30121). Compare against the affected DC Classic ranges: <= 15.006.30121 or <= 15.010.20060Affected if The installed version is 15.006.30121 or earlier, OR falls between 15.006.30122 and 15.010.20060 inclusive
-
Verify if JavaScript is enabledIn Adobe Reader/Acrobat, go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript and check if Enable Adobe JavaScript is checked/enabledAffected if JavaScript is enabled in the application preferences (the vulnerability exploits JavaScript API restrictions, so JavaScript must be enabled for the flaw to be exploitable)
A user is affected if they have Adobe Reader or Acrobat version 11.0.15 or earlier (Classic), DC Classic version 15.006.30121 or earlier, or DC Continuous version 15.010.20060 or earlier, with JavaScript enabled in the application preferences.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Adobe Reader and Acrobat to version 11.0.16 or later (Classic), 15.006.30172 or later (DC Classic), or 15.016.20039 or later (DC Continuous).
11.0.16 (11.x line) | 15.006.30172 (DC Classic) | 15.016.20039 (DC Continuous)
- Navigate to the Adobe Acrobat/Reader update mechanism or download center
- For Acrobat/Reader 11.x: Upgrade to version 11.0.16 or later
- For Acrobat/Reader DC Classic: Upgrade to version 15.006.30172 or later
- For Acrobat/Reader DC Continuous: Upgrade to version 15.016.20039 or later
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed version after update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,264.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1038 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1038 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data