CVE-2016-10421
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, and SDX20, key material is not always cleared properly.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets allows cryptographic key material to remain in memory after use instead of being properly cleared. An attacker with physical access or malware capable of reading device memory could potentially recover sensitive cryptographic keys used for encryption, authentication, or secure communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm modem chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use terminal commands such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or 'getprop' to identify the chipset model (e.g., Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650)Affected if The chipset model matches any of the affected models: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, or Mdm9650
-
Verify the Android security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number, or use 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' in terminal to check the installed security patch dateAffected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or is not displayed (indicating the device is not receiving official patches)
-
Confirm firmware version is unpatchedCheck the baseband version or modem firmware version via 'getprop' commands such as 'getprop ro.baseband' or check the modem partition if accessibleAffected if The device uses one of the affected chipset models and the security patch level has not been updated to the 2018-04-05 patch or later
If the device contains any of the affected Qualcomm modem chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, or Mdm9650) and the Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, the device is likely affected by improper cryptographic key clearing in memory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the 2018-04-05 or later Android security patch level to affected devices. For end-of-life devices unable to receive official patches, consider device replacement as no workarounds exist for improper key clearing at the firmware level.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (contact device manufacturer for specific firmware version)
- 1. Identify the device manufacturer and model that contains the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon MDM chipset (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, or MDM9650)
- 2. Check the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- 3. If the security patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, apply any available system updates from the device manufacturer
- 4. Verify the device has updated to Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later
- 5. If no OTA update is available from the device manufacturer, contact the device OEM for a firmware/modem update containing the security fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10421 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10421 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data