CVE-2016-10427
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, and SDX20, improper boundary check in RLC AM module leads to denial of service by reaching assertion.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper boundary check in the RLC AM (Radio Link Control Acknowledged Mode) module in Qualcomm Snapdragon baseband firmware allows remote attackers to trigger a denial of service via assertion by sending specially crafted RLC packets. This affects multiple mobile and wearable chipsets including MDM9206, MDM9607, SD 820, SD 835, and others.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the baseband firmware versionOn Android devices, check the baseband version via Settings > About Phone > Baseband version, or run 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' in ADB shell. On other platforms, consult the device's modem/firmware diagnostic interface.Affected if The displayed baseband version corresponds to one of the affected MDM models (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635m, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650) and cannot be determined to be a fixed version.
-
Confirm the chipset modelIdentify the SoC/chipset via 'getprop ro.board.platform' or 'getprop ro.hardware' in ADB shell, or check device specifications. The MDM9206, MDM9607, and other MDM prefixes indicate baseband modem models.Affected if The device uses a listed Qualcomm Snapdragon baseband modem (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635m, MDM9640, MDM9645, or MDM9650).
-
Check the Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' in ADB shell.Affected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, indicating the firmware fix has not been applied.
-
Verify RLC AM module activityThis is a baseband module that processes RLC packets when the cellular radio is active. Check if the device has an active cellular connection or has cellular capability enabled. There is no user-accessible command to directly inspect the RLC AM module state in the baseband.Affected if The device has cellular radio functionality enabled and uses an affected baseband firmware, making the boundary check vulnerability present in the RLC AM processing path.
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm MDM baseband firmware versions (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635m, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650) and the Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, or the firmware version cannot be confirmed as fixed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the 2018-04-05 or later Android security patch level, which contains the vendor-supplied firmware fix for this boundary check vulnerability in the RLC AM module.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10427 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data