CVE-2016-10448
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, and SDX20, a simultaneous command post for addSA or updateSA on same SA leads to memory corruption. APIs addSA and updateSA APIs access the global variable ipsec_sa_list[] outside of mutex protection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition exists in the IPsec implementation of affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chips where the addSA and updateSA APIs access the global variable ipsec_sa_list[] without proper mutex synchronization. When these functions are called simultaneously on the same Security Association, concurrent access leads to memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and chipsetCheck the device or module model number to confirm it is one of: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, or Mdm9650. These are Qualcomm Snapdragon modem modules.Affected if The device uses one of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon modem variants.
-
Check installed firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the device using commands such as 'at+cgmr' (for modems), 'cat /proc/version', or through the device's system information interface. Compare this version against the April 2018 Android security patch level.Affected if The firmware is any version prior to the April 2018 security patch, or the patch level cannot be verified.
-
Confirm IPsec is enabledCheck if IPsec is configured or active on the device. On Linux systems, examine running IPsec status with 'ip xfrm status' or check for IPsec configuration files in /etc/ipsec.d/, /etc/racoon/, or similar paths depending on the IPsec implementation used.Affected if IPsec is enabled and actively processing Security Associations on the affected device.
-
Verify mutex protection in IPsec codeIf firmware binary or source code access is available, examine the addSA and updateSA functions in the IPsec implementation. Look for mutex lock/unlock calls surrounding access to the ipsec_sa_list[] global variable.Affected if The code lacks mutex synchronization around ipsec_sa_list[] access in addSA and updateSA functions, indicating the vulnerability is present.
You are affected if your device uses one of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon modems, has IPsec enabled, and is running firmware without the April 2018 security patch that adds mutex protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch from April 2018 or later which contains the proper mutex protection for the ipsec_sa_list[] global variable access. For embedded/custom builds, add mutex locks around all accesses to ipsec_sa_list[] in the addSA and updateSA code paths.
Android security patch level April 5, 2018 or later (which includes patched Qualcomm MDM9206/MDM9607/MDM9615/MDM9625/MDM9635M/MDM9640/MDM9645/MDM9650 firmware)
- Check the current Android security patch level on the device via Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- If the patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, apply any available Android system updates from the device manufacturer
- After updating, verify the security patch level is April 5, 2018 or later via Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- Confirm the modem/baseband firmware has been updated as part of the security update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10448 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10448 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data