CVE-2016-10461
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MDM9650, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, and SDX20, lack of proper bounds checking may lead to a buffer overread.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overread vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (MDM9650, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SDX20) exists due to lack of proper bounds checking in the firmware. This allows potential remote or local attackers to read sensitive memory contents beyond buffer boundaries, potentially exposing credentials, encryption keys, or other confidential data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset model in the deviceCheck /proc/cpuinfo or device kernel messages (dmesg) for the chipset identifier such as mdm9650, sd650, sd652, sd808, sd810, sd820, or sdx20Affected if The chipset is one of: MDM9650, SD 650, SD 652, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, or SDX20
-
Check the Android security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via adb shellAffected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or is not displayed
-
Verify if the device receives Qualcomm firmware updatesCheck with the device manufacturer or carrier for firmware update availability for your specific model and chipsetAffected if No firmware update containing the 2018-04-05 security patch or later has been applied
-
Check the baseband firmware versionRun 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' or 'getprop vendor.qcom.version.baseband' via adb shell to retrieve the baseband processor versionAffected if The baseband version is older than the patched versions included in the 2018-04-05 Android security update
A device is affected if it contains one of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (MDM9650, SD 650/652/808/810/820, SDX20) and has not received the Android security patch from 2018-04-05 or later that includes the firmware fix.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Android security patches from 2018-04-05 or later, which include the Qualcomm firmware fix. Organizations should inventory affected devices and ensure they receive vendor-supplied firmware updates.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (contact device OEM for specific firmware version)
- 1. Identify the device manufacturer and model using the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (MDM9650, SD 650/652/808/810/820, SDX20)
- 2. Check the current Android Security Patch Level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level)
- 3. If the security patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, the device is vulnerable
- 4. Contact the device OEM (original equipment manufacturer) for available firmware/OTA updates
- 5. Apply the OEM-provided Android security update that includes the 2018-04-05 patch level or later
- 6. Alternatively, if the OEM no longer supports the device, consider upgrading to a newer device that receives current security patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10461 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10461 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data