CVE-2016-10462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, and Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, the Access Control policy for HLOS allows access to Slimbus, GPU, GIC resources.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Access Control policy for the High-Level Operating System (HLOS) in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors improperly allows access to protected hardware resources including Slimbus (audio subsystem), GPU (graphics processing unit), and GIC (Generic Interrupt Controller). This misconfiguration could allow code executing in the HLOS context to access and potentially manipulate critical hardware resources that should be restricted, leading to privilege escalation or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Snapdragon chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use commands like `cat /proc/cpuinfo` on Android devices to identify the processor modelAffected if Model number matches Sd 410, Sd 412, Sd 425, Sd 430, Sd 450, Sd 615, Sd 616, or Sd 415
-
Determine the Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level, or use `getprop ro.build.version.security_patch`Affected if Security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or cannot be determined
-
Check the vendor firmware versionQuery the bootloader or baseband version using `getprop` commands such as `getprop ro.build.version.all` or `getprop ro.bootimage.build.fingerprint`Affected if Firmware version is from before April 2018 and matches affected Snapdragon models
A device is likely affected if it contains an affected Snapdragon model (Sd 410/412/425/430/450/615/616/415) and has a security patch level dated before 2018-04-05, as the access control misconfiguration exists in the firmware and cannot be directly observed without vendor tooling.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied security patch level dated 2018-04-05 or later to affected Android devices. This is a firmware-level fix that must be provided by Qualcomm and device manufacturers; there is no user-configurable workaround.
Android security patch level April 5, 2018 or later (for affected Snapdragon processors)
- 1. Identify the affected device model and verify the current Android security patch level by going to Settings > About Phone > Software Information or checking the Android security patch level displayed in Settings.
- 2. Check for available system updates for the device: Go to Settings > System > System Update or Settings > About Phone > System Updates.
- 3. Apply the latest Android security update. The fix requires updating to Android with a 2018-04-05 or later security patch level.
- 4. After updating, verify the security patch level has been updated to April 2018 or later in Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Security Patch Level.
- 5. If the device manufacturer has not released an update with the April 2018 security patch level, contact the device vendor or Qualcomm for a firmware update that includes the access control policy fix.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data