CVE-2016-10466
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, and SDX20, during SSL handshake, if RNG function (crypto API) returns error, SSL uses hard-coded random value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn vulnerable Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, during SSL/TLS handshake, if the hardware Random Number Generator (RNG) from the crypto API returns an error or fails, the SSL implementation falls back to using a hard-coded static random value instead of properly handling the error. This completely undermines the cryptographic security of the SSL connection since predictable values replace proper randomness.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset modelCheck the device specifications or system information to determine the chipset model (e.g., Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, or Mdm9655)Affected if The device uses any of the listed affected chipset models (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, or Mdm9655)
-
Check the baseband firmware versionAccess the baseband or modem firmware information through the device settings or by querying the radio interface layer (e.g., via AT commands or system diagnostic tools)Affected if The baseband firmware version corresponds to the affected chipset and the patch level is not applied
-
Verify the Android security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level, or run 'adb shell getprop ro.build.version.security_patch'Affected if The Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, indicating the fix is not applied
-
Confirm SSL/TLS library in useIdentify if the device uses the vulnerable Qualcomm SSL implementation for TLS handshakes by examining the SSL library or crypto provider in useAffected if The device relies on the Qualcomm crypto API and its SSL implementation that performs the faulty RNG fallback
A device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, or Mdm9655) and has an Android security patch level earlier than 2018-04-05.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch level from 2018-04-05 or later, which contains the Qualcomm firmware fix that ensures SSL properly handles RNG errors instead of using hard-coded values.
Android Security Patch Level April 2018 or later (containing Qualcomm modem firmware fix)
- Apply the latest Android security patch level from your device manufacturer. This vulnerability was addressed in the April 2018 Android Security Patch Level.
- Verify the installed security patch level on the device by going to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level. Ensure the date is April 5, 2018 or later.
- If your device manufacturer has not released an update containing the April 2018 security patch, contact the device manufacturer for further guidance and timeline for remediation.
- For enterprise or embedded deployments using these Qualcomm modem components, contact Qualcomm or the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for specific firmware updates addressing CVE-2016-10466.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,704.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10466 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10466 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data