CVE-2016-10484
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear IPQ4019, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, and SDX20, if a RPMB listener is registered with a very small buffer size, the calculation of the maximum transfer size for read and write operations may underflow, resulting in buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors' RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) subsystem. When an RPMB listener is registered with an insufficiently small buffer size, the calculation for maximum transfer size underflows, causing a buffer overflow that could allow code execution in the secure storage context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm Snapdragon processor modelCheck the system's hardware information to determine the exact Qualcomm chip model. On Android devices, this can be found in /proc/cpuinfo or through settings. On other embedded systems, check the board or module documentation.Affected if The processor model is one of: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Ipq4019, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, or Mdm9650
-
Verify the firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version for the identified Qualcomm component. On Android, this may be available through Qualcomm's diagnostic tools or via /sys/firmware or vendor-specific interfaces. Check vendor documentation for firmware version retrieval methods.Affected if The firmware version is any version, since all versions of the affected products are vulnerable
-
Confirm RPMB subsystem is in useCheck if the Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) partition is mounted or accessible on the system. On Linux-based systems, check /sys/class/mmc_host/mmc0/mmc0:0001/block/*/rpmb or use mmc utils to query RPMB status.Affected if RPMB is actively used or accessible on the device
-
Check for the specific vulnerable conditionExamine RPMB listener registration configurations. This typically requires access to low-level firmware or secure OS debugging interfaces. Look for any RPMB listener or partition configured with buffer sizes that could trigger the underflow condition.Affected if An RPMB listener is registered with a buffer size small enough to cause the maximum transfer size calculation to underflow (typically near or below the minimum supported size)
The system is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon processors (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Ipq4019, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650) with RPMB functionality enabled, as all firmware versions of these products contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch released April 2018 or later, which includes the fix for this Qualcomm Snapdragon firmware vulnerability. If patches are unavailable for specific devices, consider replacement with updated hardware.
Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later (or device vendor-specific firmware containing the April 2018 Qualcomm security patch)
- Check the current Android security patch level on the affected device by going to Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- Update the device to the latest Android security update available from the device manufacturer
- Ensure the Android security patch level is 2018-04-05 or later, which contains the fix for CVE-2016-10484
- If the device manufacturer has not released an update with the April 2018 security patch level, consider upgrading to a device model that receives regular security updates
- For embedded/IoT devices using the affected firmware (Ipq4019, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650), contact the device vendor for firmware updates incorporating the Qualcomm fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10484 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10484 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data