CVE-2016-10902
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe wp-customer-reviews plugin before 3.0.9 for WordPress has CSRF in the admin tools.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe wp-customer-reviews plugin before version 3.0.9 for WordPress contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in its admin tools section. This allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions by forging malicious requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WordPress installation existsCheck for wp-content/plugins directory or access WordPress admin dashboard at /wp-admin/Affected if WordPress is installed and the wp-customer-reviews plugin may be present
-
Check if wp-customer-reviews plugin is installedLook for the plugin directory at wp-content/plugins/wp-customer-reviews/ or view installed plugins in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The plugin directory or listing exists in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find 'Wp Customer Reviews' to view the version number, or read the main plugin file header at wp-content/plugins/wp-customer-reviews/wp-customer-reviews.phpAffected if Installed version is less than 3.0.9 (e.g., 3.0.8, 3.0.7, etc.)
-
Confirm admin access to plugin toolsLog in as an administrator and navigate to the plugin settings page (usually under Reviews > Customer Reviews or a dedicated admin tools section)Affected if Administrator user can access the admin tools section of the plugin
User is affected if the wp-customer-reviews plugin version is below 3.0.9 and an administrator has access to the plugin admin tools section.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.0.9
Update the wp-customer-reviews plugin to version 3.0.9 or later to remediate the CSRF vulnerability in the admin tools.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10902 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10902 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data