CVE-2016-10978
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe fossura-tag-miner plugin before 1.1.5 for WordPress has CSRF.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe fossura-tag-miner WordPress plugin before version 1.1.5 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Attackers can craft malicious requests that trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions within the plugin, such as modifying settings or triggering plugin functions without their explicit consent.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the fossura-tag-miner plugin filesCheck the WordPress plugins directory at /wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named fossura-tag-miner. If the folder exists, the plugin is installed.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation.
-
Read the plugin header for version numberOpen the main plugin file (usually fossura-tag-miner.php) in the plugin folder and locate the Version header in the plugin comment block at the top of the file.Affected if The version shown is 1.1.2 or lower.
-
Verify version via WordPress admin interfaceIn the WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate 'Fossura Tag Miner' in the list. The version number is displayed beneath the plugin name.Affected if The displayed version is 1.1.2 or lower.
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify that the Fossura Tag Miner plugin is activated (the 'Activate' link is not present, or the plugin shows as active).Affected if The plugin is active and the version is 1.1.2 or lower.
The environment is affected if the fossura-tag-miner plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.1.2 or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the fossura-tag-miner plugin to version 1.1.5 or later to obtain the patched version that includes proper CSRF protection mechanisms.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10978 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10978 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data