CVE-2016-11034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with L(5.0/5.1) and M(6.0) software. The decode function in Qjpeg in Qt 5.7 allows attackers to trigger a system crash via a malformed image. The Samsung ID is SVE-2016-6560 (October 2016).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Qjpeg decode function within Qt 5.7 on Samsung mobile devices running Android L (5.0/5.1) and M (6.0). Processing a specially crafted malformed JPEG image triggers a system crash, likely due to memory corruption or invalid memory access in the image decoding routine.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.1= 6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device manufacturerCheck device settings under About phone or run 'getprop ro.product.manufacturer' and 'getprop ro.product.model' in ADB shellAffected if Device is not a Samsung mobile device (non-Samsung devices are not affected)
-
Check Android versionNavigate to Settings > About phone > Android version or execute 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if Android version is 5.0, 5.1, or 6.0 (exact versions match the affected range)
-
Identify Qt library versionSearch for Qt libraries on the device filesystem (typically in /system/lib or /vendor/lib) or check app dependencies; look for libQt5Core.so or similar Qt 5.x libraries and determine the exact Qt versionAffected if Qt 5.7 is present on the device (vulnerability exists specifically in Qt 5.7)
Device is affected only if it is a Samsung mobile running Android 5.0, 5.1, or 6.0 AND has Qt 5.7 installed; all three conditions must be true
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates from Samsung that address the Qt 5.7 vulnerability (SVE-2016-6560). Avoid opening untrusted JPEG images from unknown sources until devices are patched.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-11034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-11034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data