GaroonApplication · Cybozu

CVE-2016-1219

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-04-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cybozu Garoon before 4.2.2 allows remote attackers to bypass login authentication via vectors related to API use.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cybozu Garoon before version 4.2.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its API functionality that allows remote attackers to bypass login authentication. This critical flaw affects the web API layer and can be exploited without requiring any valid credentials.

MitigationUpgrade Cybozu Garoon to version 4.2.2 or later to address the authentication bypass. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Garoon API endpoints as a temporary compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GaroonApplication
Affected:<= 4.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cybozu Garoon is present
    Review system inventory, running processes, or look for Garoon installation directories on the server
    Affected if Cybozu Garoon software is installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed Garoon version
    Access the Garoon admin interface and navigate to system information, or check version files in the installation directory. The version is often visible in the login page footer or via /g/apiportal path
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is displayed as 4.2.1 or earlier
  3. Compare version against affected range
    If a version number is obtained, verify it falls within the affected range: any version <= 4.2.1 is vulnerable
    Affected if Installed version is 4.2.1 or any version listed as below 4.2.2
  4. Assess API exposure
    Check if Garoon API endpoints (such as /g/api or /scripts/garoon/api/) are network-accessible. Verify whether these endpoints require valid authentication tokens
    Affected if API layer is exposed to network and accepts requests without requiring valid login credentials

The environment is affected if Cybozu Garoon version 4.2.1 or earlier is running and its web API layer is accessible without authentication enforcement.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cybozu Garoon to version 4.2.2 or later to address the authentication bypass. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Garoon API endpoints as a temporary compensating control.

Recommended fix High confidence

Garoon 4.2.2

  1. Create a complete backup of the Garoon installation and database before proceeding with the upgrade
  2. Review the release notes and migration guide for Garoon 4.2.2 to understand any specific requirements
  3. Upgrade Cybozu Garoon from version 4.2.1 or earlier to version 4.2.2 or later
  4. After upgrading, verify that user authentication is functioning correctly across all login methods
  5. Test API functionality to confirm the authentication bypass vulnerability has been remediated
  6. Verify that all users can successfully log in and access their respective functions
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or compatibility changes; standard security upgrades typically do not introduce breaking changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Garoon Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1219 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data