CVE-2016-1290
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe web API in Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2.0 through 2.2(2) and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) 1.2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended RBAC restrictions and gain privileges via an HTTP request that is inconsistent with a pattern filter, aka Bug ID CSCuy10227.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe web API in Cisco Prime Infrastructure (versions 1.2.0 through 2.2(2)) and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) 1.2 contains an RBAC bypass vulnerability. Authenticated users can craft HTTP requests that circumvent pattern filter restrictions to elevate privileges beyond their assigned role. This is a privilege escalation flaw in the API's access control logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.2.0= 1.2= 1.2.0.103= 1.2.1= 1.3= 1.3.0.20= 1.4= 1.4.0.45= 1.4.1= 1.4.2= 2.0= 2.1.0= 2.2= snv_124CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco network management productCheck for presence of Cisco Prime Infrastructure or Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) on the system. Look for installation directories, running services, or check the product-specific management interfaces.Affected if Either Cisco Prime Infrastructure or Cisco EPNM is installed
-
Check product versionAccess the product's admin interface or use command line tools to query the installed version. For Prime Infrastructure, typically found in the About or Diagnostics section of the web UI, or via 'show version' command in CLI.Affected if Version matches: Cisco EPNM = 1.2.0 OR Cisco Prime Infrastructure = 1.2 through 2.2(2) inclusive (specifically 1.2, 1.2.0.103, 1.2.1, 1.3, 1.3.0.20, 1.4, 1.4.0.45, 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 2.0, 2.1.0, 2.2)
-
Verify web API is accessibleConfirm the product's web API endpoint is reachable. This is typically exposed on port 443 or 8080. Test connectivity to the API URLs such as /webacs/api/v1 or similar API endpoints.Affected if Web API is exposed and accessible from network
-
Confirm authentication is required for API accessTest API endpoints without valid credentials to confirm authentication is enforced. Check if the API allows unauthenticated requests or if proper auth is required.Affected if API accepts requests without proper authentication or allows privilege escalation through crafted requests
-
Review API access logs for anomalous requestsExamine API access logs for patterns indicating privilege escalation attempts, such as unusual role modifications or access to administrative functions by non-admin users.Affected if Logs show API requests that circumvent RBAC restrictions or elevate privileges beyond assigned roles
Environment is affected if Cisco Prime Infrastructure (versions 1.2 through 2.2(2)) or Cisco EPNM 1.2.0 is installed with the web API accessible and no additional access controls preventing the RBAC bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patches from Cisco for this vulnerability. If patches are unavailable, restrict API access to trusted users and implement additional monitoring for anomalous API requests that may indicate privilege escalation attempts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1290 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1290 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data