CVE-2016-1333
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 15.5(3)M and 15.6(1)T0a on Cisco 1000 Connected Grid routers allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) via an SNMP request for unspecified BRIDGE MIB OIDs, aka Bug ID CSCux89878.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco IOS 15.5(3)M and 15.6(1)T0a on Cisco 1000 Connected Grid routers allows remote authenticated attackers to cause device reload via crafted SNMP requests targeting unspecified BRIDGE MIB OIDs. The attack exploits improper input validation in the SNMP subsystem, leading to a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.5\(3\)m= 15.6\(1\)t0aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelUse 'show version' command or check device inventory to confirm the hardware is a Cisco 1000 Series Connected Grid Router (CGR1000)Affected if Device is not a Cisco 1000 Connected Grid router - vulnerability does not apply
-
Check IOS versionExecute 'show version' and locate the IOS software version string in the output. Compare the full version number against 15.5(3)M or 15.6(1)T0aAffected if IOS version is exactly 15.5(3)M or 15.6(1)T0a - these are the only affected versions listed
-
Verify SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' or 'show snmp group' to check if the SNMP server is running and configuredAffected if SNMP is disabled or not configured - the vulnerability cannot be exploited without SNMP access
-
Check SNMP community and access controlsUse 'show running-config | include snmp-server' to view SNMP community strings and access list bindingsAffected if SNMP is exposed to untrusted networks - the flaw is exploitable via crafted BRIDGE MIB OID requests over SNMP
The environment is affected only if the device is a Cisco 1000 Connected Grid Router running IOS version 15.5(3)M or 15.6(1)T0a with SNMP enabled and accessible to the attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable SNMP if not required, or restrict SNMP access using ACLs to trusted management hosts and implement SNMPv3 with authentication/encryption. Apply the vendor patch when available from Cisco.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1333 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1333 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data