Telepresence Video Communication Server SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2016-1338

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-03-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X8.5.1 and X8.5.2 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (VoIP outage) via a crafted SIP message, aka Bug ID CSCuu43026.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco TelePresence VCS X8.5.1 and X8.5.2 contain a vulnerability where authenticated remote users can send specially crafted SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) messages that cause the VoIP service to fail, resulting in a denial of service and VoIP outage.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco TelePresence VCS to a version beyond X8.5.2 that includes the fix for CSCuu43026. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict SIP access to trusted endpoints and monitor for service disruptions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Telepresence Video Communication Server SoftwareApplication
Affected:= x8.5.1= x8.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Cisco TelePresence VCS version
    Log into the VCS admin interface and navigate to System > About or use the CLI command 'xstatus version' to determine the exact software version installed
    Affected if The installed version is exactly X8.5.1 or X8.5.2
  2. Verify SIP service is enabled
    Check the VCS configuration under SIP > SIP Settings or the SIP proxy configuration to confirm the SIP service is active and listening for connections
    Affected if SIP service is enabled and reachable on the VCS
  3. Confirm SIP is exposed to network
    Review the VCS firewall rules, SIP listen addresses, or the Allow list under SIP > Configuration to determine if SIP ports (5060/5061) are open to untrusted networks
    Affected if SIP is accessible from networks that include untrusted or unknown users
  4. Check authentication configuration for SIP
    Examine the SIP authentication settings under SIP > Authentication to determine whether remote users are required to authenticate before sending SIP messages
    Affected if SIP authentication is not enforced or allows unauthenticated/weak authentication for remote users
  5. Review for service disruptions
    Check the VCS event logs or system status under Logs > Event Log for recent SIP-related crashes, service failures, or unexpected restarts of the VoIP service
    Affected if There are recent SIP crash logs or VoIP service failures that match the timing of potential exploitation

If the installed version is exactly X8.5.1 or X8.5.2 and the SIP service is enabled and accessible to remote users, the environment is vulnerable to this denial-of-service flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Cisco TelePresence VCS to a version beyond X8.5.2 that includes the fix for CSCuu43026. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict SIP access to trusted endpoints and monitor for service disruptions.

Fix this in Telepresence Video Communication Server Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1338 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1338 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data