Unified Computing System Platform EmulatorApplication · Cisco

CVE-2016-1339

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-04-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Platform Emulator 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, and 3.0(2c)TS9 allows local users to gain privileges via crafted arguments on a ucspe-copy command line, aka Bug ID CSCux68832.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Local privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco UCS Platform Emulator versions 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, and 3.0(2c)TS9. The flaw exists in the ucspe-copy command-line tool, which fails to properly validate arguments, allowing local authenticated users to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available; otherwise, restrict local user access to systems running the emulator and limit execution permissions on the ucspe-copy binary to trusted administrators only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Computing System Platform EmulatorApplication
Affected:= 2.5\(2\)ts4= 3.0\(2c\)a= 3.0\(2c\)ts9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco UCS Platform Emulator is installed
    Locate the UCS Platform Emulator installation directory or check for the presence of emulator-related files and processes on the system
    Affected if The emulator software is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed emulator version
    Run the version command or check the about/version information within the UCS Platform Emulator interface, or inspect version files in the installation directory
    Affected if The installed version matches exactly 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, or 3.0(2c)TS9
  3. Locate the ucspe-copy command-line tool
    Search for the ucspe-copy binary or script within the emulator installation directory and verify its presence
    Affected if The ucspe-copy tool exists in the emulator installation
  4. Verify local user access to the system
    Confirm that local user authentication is enabled and that non-administrator users can access the emulator system
    Affected if Local authenticated users have access to the system where the emulator is running
  5. Check file permissions on ucspe-copy
    Inspect the execute permissions and ownership of the ucspe-copy binary to determine if untrusted users can run it
    Affected if The ucspe-copy binary is executable by non-administrator users

The environment is affected if the Cisco UCS Platform Emulator is installed with version 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, or 3.0(2c)TS9, and local authenticated users can access and execute the ucspe-copy command-line tool.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available; otherwise, restrict local user access to systems running the emulator and limit execution permissions on the ucspe-copy binary to trusted administrators only.

Fix this in Unified Computing System Platform Emulator Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1339 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data