CVE-2016-1339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Platform Emulator 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, and 3.0(2c)TS9 allows local users to gain privileges via crafted arguments on a ucspe-copy command line, aka Bug ID CSCux68832.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco UCS Platform Emulator versions 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, and 3.0(2c)TS9. The flaw exists in the ucspe-copy command-line tool, which fails to properly validate arguments, allowing local authenticated users to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5\(2\)ts4= 3.0\(2c\)a= 3.0\(2c\)ts9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco UCS Platform Emulator is installedLocate the UCS Platform Emulator installation directory or check for the presence of emulator-related files and processes on the systemAffected if The emulator software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed emulator versionRun the version command or check the about/version information within the UCS Platform Emulator interface, or inspect version files in the installation directoryAffected if The installed version matches exactly 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, or 3.0(2c)TS9
-
Locate the ucspe-copy command-line toolSearch for the ucspe-copy binary or script within the emulator installation directory and verify its presenceAffected if The ucspe-copy tool exists in the emulator installation
-
Verify local user access to the systemConfirm that local user authentication is enabled and that non-administrator users can access the emulator systemAffected if Local authenticated users have access to the system where the emulator is running
-
Check file permissions on ucspe-copyInspect the execute permissions and ownership of the ucspe-copy binary to determine if untrusted users can run itAffected if The ucspe-copy binary is executable by non-administrator users
The environment is affected if the Cisco UCS Platform Emulator is installed with version 2.5(2)TS4, 3.0(2c)A, or 3.0(2c)TS9, and local authenticated users can access and execute the ucspe-copy command-line tool.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches when available; otherwise, restrict local user access to systems running the emulator and limit execution permissions on the ucspe-copy binary to trusted administrators only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data