CVE-2016-1369
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 5585-X FirePOWER Security Services Processor (SSP) module for Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services 5.3.1 through 6.0.0 misconfigures kernel logging, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption, and inspection outage or module outage) via a flood of crafted IP traffic, aka Bug ID CSCux19922.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Cisco ASA 5585-X FirePOWER SSP module running ASA with FirePOWER Services versions 5.3.1 through 6.0.0 contains a kernel logging misconfiguration. Remote attackers can exploit this by sending a flood of crafted IP traffic, causing excessive resource consumption that leads to inspection outage or complete module failure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.3.1= 5.3.1.1= 5.4.0= 5.4.0.1= 5.4.0.2= 5.4.0.3= 5.4.0.4= 5.4.0.5= 5.4.0.6= 5.4.1= 5.4.1.1= 5.4.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the hardware modelExecute `show version` on the ASA CLI or check the physical device labeling to confirm the model is Cisco ASA 5585-X FirePOWER SSPAffected if The hardware is not an ASA 5585-X FirePOWER SSP module
-
Verify FirePOWER Services is enabledExecute `show module` or `show module 1` within the ASA CLI to confirm the FirePOWER module is online and runningAffected if FirePOWER Services module is not installed or not running
-
Check the FirePOWER Services versionAccess the FirePOWER module CLI (session 1) and run `show version` or from ASA run `show module 1 | include Version` to retrieve the FirePOWER Services software versionAffected if The installed version matches 5.3.1, 5.3.1.1, 5.4.0, 5.4.0.1, 5.4.0.2, 5.4.0.3, 5.4.0.4, 5.4.0.5, 5.4.0.6, 5.4.1, 5.4.1.1, or 5.4.1.2
-
Confirm network exposure to untrusted trafficReview the ASA interface configurations and security policies to determine if the FirePOWER module processes traffic from untrusted networks (such as internet-facing interfaces)Affected if The module processes inspection traffic from external or untrusted network sources
You are affected if you are running a Cisco ASA 5585-X with FirePOWER Services enabled and the FirePOWER version matches one of the listed affected versions (5.3.1 through 5.4.1.2) while processing untrusted network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for Bug ID CSCux19922 by upgrading to a fixed FirePOWER Services version (post-6.0.0). As a workaround, implement rate limiting or ingress traffic filtering at network edges to reduce the impact of traffic floods.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1369 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1369 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data