CVE-2016-1384
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe NTP implementation in Cisco IOS 15.1 and 15.5 and IOS XE 3.2 through 3.17 allows remote attackers to modify the system time via crafted packets, aka Bug ID CSCux46898.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NTP implementation in Cisco IOS 15.1/15.5 and IOS XE 3.2-3.17 contains a vulnerability allowing remote, unauthenticated attackers to send crafted NTP packets that modify the system time. This is critical because time manipulation can break cryptographic protocols, authentication mechanisms (Kerberos, SSL/TLS), and logging integrity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.1\(1\)s= 15.1\(1\)s1= 15.1\(1\)s2= 15.1\(2\)s= 15.1\(2\)s1= 15.1\(2\)s2= 15.1\(3\)s= 15.1\(3\)s0a= 15.1\(3\)s1= 15.1\(3\)s2= 15.1\(3\)s3= 15.1\(3\)s4= 3.2.0ja= 3.2.0s= 3.2.0se= 3.2.0sg= 3.2.0xo= 3.2.1s= 3.2.1se= 3.2.1sg= 3.2.1xo= 3.2.2s= 3.2.2se= 3.2.2sgCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device OS and versionRun 'show version' on the Cisco device CLI and note the IOS or IOS XE version string (e.g., 15.1(1)s, 15.1(3)S4, 3.2.0JA)Affected if The version matches any of the specific affected versions listed in the CVE: iOS 15.1(1)s through 15.1(3)S4, or IOS XE 3.2.0JA through 3.2.2SG
-
Verify NTP is enabled on the deviceRun 'show running-config | include ntp' or 'show ntp status' to check if NTP is configuredAffected if NTP is enabled and the device is using a vulnerable version
-
Check NTP mode and configurationRun 'show ntp associations detail' to see configured NTP servers and the mode (client/server)Affected if The device is configured as an NTP client accepting requests from any source
-
Review NTP access control settingsRun 'show running-config | include access-list' and inspect any access-lists applied to NTP, or check NTP-specific access restrictions with 'show ntp associations'Affected if No access-list restricts NTP to trusted sources, meaning NTP is accessible from any network
The device is affected if it runs a matching vulnerable iOS/IOS XE version AND has NTP enabled with unrestricted network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Cisco security updates to upgrade to a fixed IOS/IOS XE version. As an interim control, restrict NTP access using access-lists to permit only trusted management network sources.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,368.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1384 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data