Ios XrOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2016-1407

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-05-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco IOS XR through 5.3.2 mishandles Local Packet Transport Services (LPTS) flow-base entries, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (session drop) by making many connection attempts to open TCP ports, aka Bug ID CSCux95576.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco IOS XR through version 5.2.3 mishandles Local Packet Transport Services (LPTS) flow-base entries. Remote attackers can cause denial of service by making many connection attempts to open TCP ports, exhausting flow-base entries and causing session drops.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco IOS XR to version 5.3.3 or later per Cisco advisory. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network segmentation and rate limiting to reduce exposure to external attack vectors.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ios XrOperating system
Affected:= 2.0.0= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 3.2.2= 3.2.3= 3.2.4= 3.2.6= 3.2.50= 3.3.0= 3.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Cisco IOS XR version
    Execute 'show version' or 'admin show version' in the IOS XR CLI to retrieve the running software version
    Affected if The version shown is any of these: 2.0.0, 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.6, 3.2.50, 3.3.0, 3.3.1 (versions 2.0.0 through 3.3.1 are affected)
  2. Confirm LPTS feature is in use
    Execute 'show lpts flow-ownership brief' to display LPTS flow ownership table and confirm LPTS is active on the system
    Affected if The command returns output showing active LPTS flow entries, indicating the feature is enabled and processing traffic
  3. Check current flow-base entry utilization
    Execute 'show lpts statistics' or 'show lpts pfilter brief' to view current flow-base entry counts and usage statistics
    Affected if The output shows high flow-base entry counts approaching configured limits, or the statistics indicate near-exhaustion of available entries
  4. Verify external-facing TCP listener configuration
    Review running configuration with 'show running-config' or check access lists and interface configurations for publicly accessible TCP services
    Affected if The system has externally reachable TCP ports or services that could accept connection attempts from untrusted networks

If the Cisco IOS XR version is 2.0.0 through 3.3.1 and LPTS is actively processing traffic with externally accessible TCP services, the environment is vulnerable to flow-base entry exhaustion via remote connection attempts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Cisco IOS XR to version 5.3.3 or later per Cisco advisory. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network segmentation and rate limiting to reduce exposure to external attack vectors.

Fix this in Ios Xr Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1407 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data