CVE-2016-1426
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS XR 5.x through 5.2.5 on NCS 6000 devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (timer consumption and Route Processor reload) via crafted SSH traffic, aka Bug ID CSCux76819.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco IOS XR versions 5.x through 5.2.5 on NCS 6000 series devices contains a vulnerability in the SSH handling subsystem where specially crafted SSH packets trigger excessive timer consumption, causing the Route Processor to reload and resulting in a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0.0= 5.0.1= 5.0_base= 5.1.0= 5.1.1= 5.1.1.k9sec= 5.1.2= 5.1.3= 5.2.0= 5.2.1= 5.2.2= 5.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show platform' or check hardware inventory to confirm the device is a Cisco NCS 6000 series routerAffected if Device model is NCS-6000 series or NCS 6001/6008/6010
-
Check IOS XR versionRun 'show version' to display the installed Cisco IOS XR versionAffected if Version is 5.0.0, 5.0.1, 5.0_base, 5.1.0, 5.1.1, 5.1.1.k9sec, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.2.0, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, or 5.2.3 (versions 5.x through 5.2.5 are affected)
-
Verify SSH service is enabledRun 'show ssh' or 'show running-config | include ssh' to check if SSH is configured and activeAffected if SSH server or client is enabled on the device
-
Assess SSH network exposureReview access control lists, interface configurations, or management network placement to determine if SSH is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if SSH management interface is accessible from outside trusted network segments
Device is affected if it is an NCS 6000 series running Cisco IOS XR versions 5.0.0 through 5.2.5 with SSH service enabled and exposed to potentially untrusted SSH sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS XR to a version beyond 5.2.5 (or apply the relevant patch). As a compensating control, restrict or filter SSH access to trusted sources at network perimeter devices.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1426 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1426 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data