CVE-2016-1646
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, does not properly consider element data types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in Google V8's Array.prototype.concat implementation allows crafted JavaScript to trigger out-of-bounds memory reads by not properly validating element data types, potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 14.04= 15.10= 16.04< 49.0.2623.108= 6.0= 6.7= 6.0= 6.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Google Chrome versionNavigate to chrome://settings/help or run 'google-chrome --version' / 'chromium --version' in terminalAffected if Version is earlier than 49.0.2623.108
-
Identify standalone V8 JavaScript engine versionIf V8 is embedded in a custom application, check the V8 version via the application's about page, or inspect the bundled V8 library file versionAffected if V8 version is earlier than the version shipped in Chrome 49.0.2623.108 (approximately 49.0.2623.75) and the application uses Array.prototype.concat with untrusted input
-
Determine if Array.prototype.concat is used with untrusted JavaScriptReview application code or browser extension JavaScript for usage of the concat() method on arrays, especially with data from untrusted sourcesAffected if The concat method is called on arrays containing data from untrusted sources without prior type validation
-
Check for presence of vulnerable builtins.cc in custom V8 buildsIf maintaining a custom V8 build, locate and inspect the builtins.cc file in the source tree, specifically the ArrayPrototypeConcat function implementationAffected if The builtins.cc file is from a V8 version prior to the fix and lacks proper element data type validation in the concat implementation
-
Verify OS-level browser package versions (Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL)Run 'dpkg -l | grep chrome' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'rpm -qa | grep chrome' (RHEL) to list installed Chrome/Chromium package versionsAffected if The installed Chrome/Chromium package version is less than 49.0.2623.108
A defender is affected if Google Chrome or a Chromium-based browser is installed with version below 49.0.2623.108, or if a custom V8 build is in use with the vulnerable Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped49.0.2623.108
Update the Google Chrome browser to version 49.0.2623.108 or later; for applications using the V8 JavaScript engine, update to a V8 version that includes the fix for this vulnerability.
Google Chrome 49.0.2623.108 or later
- Verify current Google Chrome version by navigating to chrome://settings/help
- Download Google Chrome version 49.0.2623.108 or later from the official Google Chrome website
- Install the updated Chrome browser following the standard installation process for your operating system
- Restart the browser to apply the update
- Alternatively, use your system's package manager to update the chromium-browser or google-chrome-stable package to version 49.0.2623.108 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1646 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data