CVE-2016-1697
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe FrameLoader::startLoad function in WebKit/Source/core/loader/FrameLoader.cpp in Blink, as used in Google Chrome before 51.0.2704.79, does not prevent frame navigations during DocumentLoader detach operations, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via crafted JavaScript code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FrameLoader::startLoad function in Blink (WebKit) fails to prevent frame navigations during DocumentLoader detach operations. This allows specially crafted JavaScript to navigate frames to different origins when such navigations should be blocked, enabling a Same Origin Policy bypass.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 51.0.2704.63= 14.04= 15.10= 16.04= 8.0= 6.0= 6.0= 6.0= 42.1= 13.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Google Chrome version on Windows or MacOpen Chrome, click the menu icon (three dots), select Help, then About Google Chrome. Note the version number displayed.Affected if Version displayed is 51.0.2704.63 or lower
-
Check Chromium version on Linux systemsRun 'chromium --version' or 'google-chrome --version' in a terminal to retrieve the installed browser version.Affected if Version displayed is 51.0.2704.63 or lower
-
Check installed package version on Debian/UbuntuRun 'dpkg -l | grep chromium' or 'dpkg -l | grep chrome' to list the installed browser package and its version.Affected if Package version corresponds to 51.0.2704.63 or lower
-
Check installed package version on RHEL/CentOSRun 'rpm -qa | grep -i chrome' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i chromium' to list the installed browser package and its version.Affected if Package version corresponds to 51.0.2704.63 or lower
-
Check installed package version on openSUSERun 'rpm -qa | grep -i chromium' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i chrome' to list the installed browser package and its version.Affected if Package version corresponds to 51.0.2704.63 or lower
You are affected if any installed browser using the Blink rendering engine (Google Chrome, Chromium) has version 51.0.2704.63 or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Google Chrome to version 51.0.2704.79 or later to obtain the patch that fixes the frame navigation check during DocumentLoader detach operations.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1697 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1697 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data