CVE-2016-1896
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace condition in the initialization process on Lexmark printers with firmware ATL before ATL.02.049, CB before CB.02.049, PP before PP.02.049, and YK before YK.02.049 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging incorrect detection of the security-jumper status.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in the initialization process of Lexmark printers allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by incorrectly detecting the security-jumper status during startup. This pre-authentication bypass affects multiple firmware lines (ATL, CB, PP, YK) below specific version thresholds.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= cb.02.048<= atl.02.048<= yk.02.048<= pp.02.048CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lexmark printer modelAccess the printer's web interface (embedded web server) or check the device label to confirm it is a Lexmark printer and note the model number.Affected if Device is not a Lexmark printer - not applicable to this CVE.
-
Retrieve firmware versionLog into the printer web interface and navigate to the 'Firmware' or 'General' settings page, or use SNMP to query the printer (OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.43.5.1.1.16.1). Record the exact firmware version string.Affected if Unable to retrieve firmware version - further investigation may be required.
-
Identify firmware lineExamine the firmware version string. The prefix indicates the firmware line: 'cb' = CB line, 'atl' = ATL line, 'yk' = YK line, 'pp' = PP line. For example, version 'cb.02.048' belongs to the CB line.Affected if Firmware version does not match any of the four affected lines (ATL, CB, PP, YK) - not affected.
-
Compare against affected version thresholdsCompare your installed firmware version to the affected thresholds: CB line: <= cb.02.048; ATL line: <= atl.02.048; YK line: <= yk.02.048; PP line: <= pp.02.048. Check if your version is at or below the threshold for your identified line.Affected if Firmware version is at or below the threshold for the detected line - printer is affected by CVE-2016-1896.
A Lexmark printer is affected if its firmware version (CB, ATL, YK, or PP line) is at or below 02.048 for that respective line.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Lexmark printer firmware to version ATL.02.049, CB.02.049, PP.02.049, YK.02.049 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to printer management interfaces.
Firmware version 02.049 for the respective model family (ATL.02.049, CB.02.049, PP.02.049, or YK.02.049)
- 1. Identify the Lexmark printer model to determine the firmware family (CB, ATL, PP, or YK).
- 2. Visit support.lexmark.com and navigate to the Drivers & Downloads section for the specific printer model.
- 3. Download the firmware update version ATL.02.049 (for ATL models), CB.02.049 (for CB models), PP.02.049 (for PP models), or YK.02.049 (for YK models).
- 4. Access the printer's web management interface or use Lexmark's firmware update utility.
- 5. Upload and apply the firmware update following the on-screen instructions.
- 6. After the update completes, verify the firmware version has been upgraded to the patched release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1896 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data