CVE-2016-2071
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCitrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and NetScaler Gateway 11.x before 11.0 Build 64.34, 10.5 before 10.5 Build 59.13, and 10.5.e before Build 59.1305.e allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified NS Web GUI commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway Web GUI interfaces. Unspecified commands in the NS Web GUI allow remote attackers to gain elevated privileges. Affected versions are NetScaler 11.x before build 64.34, 10.5 before build 59.13, and 10.5.e before build 59.1305.e.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.5= 10.5e= 11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetScaler ADC or Gateway installationRun command 'show version' or 'nsversion' via NetScaler CLI to confirm the product and capture the full build stringAffected if The command returns a NetScaler build number that matches version 10.5, 10.5e, or 11.x
-
Compare build number against fixed versionsExtract the build number from the version output and compare against: 64.34 (for 11.x), 59.13 (for 10.5), or 59.1305.e (for 10.5.e)Affected if Installed build is lower than the corresponding fixed build for your version branch
-
Confirm Web GUI management interface is enabledRun command 'show mgmtParameter' or check if HTTP/HTTPS management ports (typically 80/443 or 8080/8443) are listening and accessibleAffected if The Web GUI interface is enabled and exposed, as this is the attack surface for the privilege escalation
-
Verify external or untrusted network access to management interfaceReview network access controls, firewall rules, or NSRadius settings to determine if the Web GUI is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if Management interface is accessible from networks outside the trusted administrative zone
You are affected if your NetScaler runs version 10.5, 10.5e, or 11.x with a build lower than the fixed threshold AND the Web GUI management interface is enabled and reachable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade NetScaler ADC/Gateway to the fixed builds (11.0 Build 64.34, 10.5 Build 59.13, or 10.5.e Build 59.1305.e). If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict or disable the NS Web GUI management interface and ensure only trusted networks can access management ports.
NetScaler ADC/Gateway 11.0 Build 64.34 or later; NetScaler 10.5 Build 59.13 or later; NetScaler 10.5.e Build 59.1305.e or later
- 1. Identify current NetScaler build version by logging into the CLI and running 'show version' or checking via the web GUI under System > Information > Version
- 2. Confirm the current build is one of the vulnerable versions: 11.x before Build 64.34, 10.5 before Build 59.13, or 10.5.e before Build 59.1305.e
- 3. Download the fixed build from Citrix support portal (support.citrix.com) - search for Build 64.34 or later for 11.x, or Build 59.13 or later for 10.5/10.5.e
- 4. Review Citrix upgrade documentation for your specific model to ensure compatibility and backup requirements
- 5. Create a full configuration backup before upgrading
- 6. Apply the upgrade using the CLI (via 'install' command) or the web GUI (System > Upgrade Wizard)
- 7. After upgrade completes, verify the new build version matches the fixed release
- 8. Test NetScaler functionality and confirm the vulnerability is addressed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2071 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2071 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data