CVE-2016-2285
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Moxa MiiNePort_E1_4641 devices with firmware 1.1.10 Build 09120714, MiiNePort_E1_7080 devices with firmware 1.1.10 Build 09120714, MiiNePort_E2_1242 devices with firmware 1.1 Build 10080614, MiiNePort_E2_4561 devices with firmware 1.1 Build 10080614, and MiiNePort E3 devices with firmware 1.0 Build 11071409 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web management interface of Moxa MiiNePort series device firmware allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests, effectively hijacking their session authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1= 1.1= 1.1.10= 1.0= 1.1.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the device web management interface and navigate to the System Settings or About/Firmware Information page to view the exact firmware version. If the web interface is not accessible, check the device label or use the Moxa administration utility to retrieve version information.Affected if The device is a Moxa MiiNePort E2 1242 (firmware 1.1), E2 4561 (firmware 1.1), E1 7080 (firmware 1.1.10), E3 (firmware 1.0), or E1 4641 (firmware 1.1.10)
-
Confirm web management interface is activeAttempt to access the device by entering its IP address in a web browser. If a login prompt or management dashboard appears, the web interface is enabled.Affected if The web management interface is accessible and responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests
-
Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokensLog into the web interface and view the page source (right-click, View Page Source) of a state-changing form such as network settings, user management, or device configuration. Look for a hidden input field containing a random token value or check if forms submit to an endpoint that validates anti-CSRF headers.Affected if The forms do not contain hidden anti-CSRF tokens and the firmware version matches an affected version listed above
-
Verify Origin and Referer header handlingUse a browser developer tool or HTTP client to submit a state-changing request with a mismatched or missing Origin/Referer header. Observe whether the request is accepted or rejected by the server.Affected if The server accepts requests without validating Origin/Referer headers and the firmware version is in the affected range
The device is affected if it is a Moxa MiiNePort model running one of the specified firmware versions (E2 1242/4561 = 1.1, E1 7080/4641 = 1.1.10, E3 = 1.0) AND has its web management interface exposed AND lacks anti-CSRF token validation in its forms.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) in all state-changing forms and verify Origin/Referer headers server-side; apply vendor firmware patches when available and restrict management interface access to trusted networks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2285 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data