CVE-2016-2790
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe graphite2::TtfUtil::GetTableInfo function in Graphite 2 before 1.3.6, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 45.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.7, does not initialize memory for an unspecified data structure, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted Graphite smart font.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe graphite2::TtfUtil::GetTableInfo function in Graphite 2 library before 1.3.6 fails to initialize memory for an unspecified data structure when parsing Graphite smart fonts. This uninitialized memory can be exploited by remote attackers via crafted fonts to cause denial of service (crash) or potentially achieve unknown other impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 44.0.2= 38.0= 38.0.1= 38.0.5= 38.1.0= 38.1.1= 38.2.0= 38.2.1= 38.3.0= 38.4.0= 38.5.0= 38.5.1= 5.0= 6= 7= 42.1= 13.1= 13.2= 12.0<= 1.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Graphite2 library versionRun 'rpm -q libgraphite2' or 'dpkg -l libgraphite2-3' or 'graphite2-version' to see installed library version; alternatively check file version of libgraphite2.so in /usr/lib/Affected if Version is 1.3.5 or lower, or if the library cannot be found but is required by applications
-
Check Mozilla Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' or check installed package version via 'rpm -q firefox' or 'dpkg -l firefox'Affected if Version is 44.0.2 or lower, or any version in the 38.x series (38.0 through 38.5.1)
-
Verify Graphite font handling is in useSearch for .ttf or .otf font files on the system that may contain Graphite smart font tables; use 'fc-list | grep -i graphite' or inspect font directories in /usr/share/fonts/Affected if Graphite-enabled fonts are installed and applications use them to render text
-
Check for vulnerable library in application dependenciesFor applications that bundle Graphite2, check the bundled library version in the application directory or via 'ldd' output showing libgraphite2 pathAffected if Application links to or bundles libgraphite2 version 1.3.5 or lower
A user is affected if they have Graphite2 library version 1.3.5 or earlier, or Mozilla Firefox version 44.0.2 or earlier/38.x series, AND process Graphite smart fonts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Graphite 2 library to version 1.3.6 or later, or update affected Mozilla Firefox installations to 45.0 (desktop) or Firefox ESR 38.7 and later to incorporate the patched library.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2790 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.oracle.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2790 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data