CVE-2016-3279
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Office 2010 SP2, Excel 2010 SP2, PowerPoint 2010 SP2, Word 2010 SP2, Excel 2013 SP1, PowerPoint 2013 SP1, Word 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 RT SP1, PowerPoint 2013 RT SP1, Word 2013 RT SP1, Excel 2016, Word 2016, Word Automation Services on SharePoint Server 2010 SP2, and Office Web Apps 2010 SP2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted XLA file, aka "Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office products (2010, 2013, 2016) and Office Web Apps allows arbitrary code execution via specially crafted XLA (Excel Add-in) files. When a user opens a malicious XLA file, the attacker can run code in the context of the current user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2010= 2013= 2016= 2013= 2010= 2010= 2010= 2013= 2013= 2010= 2010= 2013= 2016CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Microsoft Office product and versionOpen any Office application (Excel, Word, PowerPoint), go to File > Account, and note the version shown under 'About [App]'. Alternatively, open Programs and Features in Control Panel and locate Microsoft Office in the list.Affected if The installed version is Excel, PowerPoint, or Word 2010, 2013, or 2016 (or the corresponding Office suite version)
-
Confirm XLA add-in support exists in the installationIn the affected Office application, navigate to File > Options > Trust Center > Trust Center Settings > Add-ins. Look for 'Excel Add-ins' or 'PowerPoint Add-ins' listed as active add-in types.Affected if XLA add-in types are available and listed in the Add-ins management interface
-
Determine if XLA add-ins are allowed to loadIn Trust Center Settings > Add-ins, check whether the option to disable all Application Add-ins is unchecked (meaning add-ins are enabled). Also verify no group policy is blocking add-ins.Affected if Add-ins are not disabled and XLA files can be loaded by the application
-
Check for presence of security update for this CVEOpen Windows Update, view Update History, or check the installed updates list for a security update released around July 2016 that addresses this vulnerability in Office.Affected if The specific security update for CVE-2016-3279 is NOT installed (the system is unpatched)
-
Verify XLA file attachment handling in email gatewayInspect email security gateway or mail server configuration to determine if XLA file attachments are being blocked or filtered before delivery.Affected if XLA attachments are not being blocked and could reach end-user mailboxes
A user is affected if they have an unpatched Office 2010/2013/2016 installation where XLA add-ins are permitted to load, allowing malicious XLA files to execute code upon opening.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Microsoft security updates for CVE-2016-3279 to all affected Office installations. Additionally, configure email/gateway filtering to block XLA attachments and disable XLA add-in loading in the Trust Center settings until patches are deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3279 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3279 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data