Word ViewerApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2016-3283

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft Word Viewer allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A memory corruption vulnerability in Microsoft Word Viewer allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by tricking users into opening a specially crafted Office document. The vulnerability stems from improper memory handling when parsing Office files, leading to potential code execution in the context of the current user.

MitigationApply the relevant Microsoft security update for Microsoft Word Viewer to patch the memory corruption vulnerability. Until the patch is applied, avoid opening untrusted Office documents and consider disabling the Word Viewer COM component as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Word ViewerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Word Viewer installation exists
    Check for the presence of the Word Viewer executable. On 32-bit systems, look for 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\WordView\WordView.exe'. On 64-bit systems, check both the 32-bit path and 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\WordView\WordView.exe'. You can also query the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\WordView.exe for the installation path.
    Affected if The Word Viewer executable is found on the system, indicating the software is installed.
  2. Confirm the installed version
    Right-click the WordView.exe file, select Properties, then go to the Details tab to view the File Version. Alternatively, run 'wmic product get name,version' or use PowerShell 'Get-ItemProperty' on the executable to retrieve version information.
    Affected if Any version number is returned, confirming Word Viewer is installed (all versions are affected per the CVE).
  3. Verify the application can open Office documents
    Check if the Word Viewer file association handler is registered. Look in the Windows Registry under HKCR\.docx\OpenWithProgids or HKCR\Word.Viewer.8\shell\Open\command to confirm the viewer is registered as a handler for Office document types.
    Affected if Word Viewer is registered as an handler for Office documents, meaning it can be invoked to parse files.

The environment is affected if Microsoft Word Viewer is installed and can be used to open Office documents, since all versions of this software contain the memory corruption vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for Microsoft Word Viewer to patch the memory corruption vulnerability. Until the patch is applied, avoid opening untrusted Office documents and consider disabling the Word Viewer COM component as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Word Viewer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3283 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data