CVE-2016-3338
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Common Log File System (CLFS) driver in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0026, CVE-2016-3332, CVE-2016-3333, CVE-2016-3334, CVE-2016-3335, CVE-2016-3340, CVE-2016-3342, CVE-2016-3343, and CVE-2016-7184.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows Common Log File System (CLFS) driver. A local attacker with the ability to execute a crafted application can elevate their privileges to SYSTEM or other high-privilege contexts by exploiting improper handling of objects in the CLFS driver.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 1511= 1607all versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versions= r2all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' from the Run dialog or execute 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt and note the OS version and build numberAffected if The version is Windows 10 (any build), Windows 7 (any), Windows 8.1 (any), Windows Rt 8.1 (any), Windows Server 2008 (any), Windows Server 2012 (any), Windows Server 2016 (any), or Windows Vista (any)
-
Locate the CLFS driverOpen Command Prompt and run 'sc query clfs' to query the CLFS service status, or check for C:\Windows\System32\clfs.sysAffected if The CLFS driver (clfs.sys) exists on the system and is running as a service
-
Check CLFS driver file versionRight-click clfs.sys in C:\Windows\System32\, select Properties, then view the Details tab for File Version; alternatively run 'wmic datafile where "name='C:\\Windows\\System32\\clfs.sys'" get Version'Affected if The driver file version is lower than the patched version released in MS16-101 (July 2016)
-
Verify security update installationRun 'wmic qfe list' or open Control Panel > Programs > View installed updates, then search for update KB3178465 (July 2016, MS16-101) or later cumulative updatesAffected if The system is missing the MS16-101 security update (KB3178465) or subsequent updates that address CVE-2016-3338
The system is vulnerable if it runs an affected Windows version, the CLFS driver is present, and the MS16-101 update (KB3178465) or later is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Microsoft security updates from MS16-101 (July 2016) or later cumulative updates that address CVE-2016-3338. Prioritize patching domain controllers and servers given the local privilege escalation risk.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3338 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3338 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data