CVE-2016-3443
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to 2D. NOTE: the previous information is from the April 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that this issue allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via crafted font data, which triggers an out-of-bounds read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a font parsing vulnerability in Oracle Java SE's 2D graphics component. Remote attackers can exploit this by submitting crafted font data that triggers an out-of-bounds read, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information from memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to obtain the exact version string (e.g., 1.8.0_77)Affected if The version shows 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 family without having applied the security updates (6u113, 7u99, or 8u77 or later)
-
Confirm Oracle Java SE is in useRun 'java -version' and verify the vendor line shows Oracle Corporation or Oracle OpenJDKAffected if The JRE/JDK is Oracle-branded and the version falls within the affected families
-
Verify 2D component is presentThe java.desktop module containing the 2D graphics component is part of standard Java SE installation; confirm Java runs normally with graphical operationsAffected if Java SE is installed with standard libraries (default configuration) and version is unpatched
-
Check if font processing is accessibleThe vulnerability is triggered when processing untrusted font files through Java 2D rendering pipelines; verify applications or applets process user-supplied font dataAffected if Applications process untrusted font files using Java 2D APIs (java.awt.Font, Font2D, etc.) on an unpatched version
You are affected if you run Oracle Java SE (JDK or JRE) versions 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 that have not been updated to 6u113, 7u99, or 8u77 respectively, and your applications process font data through the 2D component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Oracle Java SE security updates 6u113, 7u99, 8u77 or later to patch the 2D component vulnerability; consider disabling Java browser plugins and restricting untrusted font file processing until patching is complete.
Java SE 6 Update 115 or later; Java SE 7 Update 101 or later; Java SE 8 Update 91 or later (or migrate to Java 11/17 LTS for long-term support)
- 1. Identify all systems running Java SE 6, 7, or 8 (JDK or JRE).
- 2. Determine the exact version installed using 'java -version' or checking the JRE/JDK installation directory.
- 3. Download the latest Oracle Java SE Critical Patch Update (CPU) that addresses this vulnerability.
- 4. For Java 6: Upgrade to Java SE 6 Update 115 or later.
- 5. For Java 7: Upgrade to Java SE 7 Update 101 or later.
- 6. For Java 8: Upgrade to Java SE 8 Update 91 or later.
- 7. Apply the upgrade following standard deployment procedures for your organization.
- 8. Verify the new version is running: execute 'java -version' and confirm the version number matches or exceeds the fixed release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3443 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- security.netapp.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3443 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data