CVE-2016-3456
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to Dialog Box.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (CMRO) module affecting versions 12.1.1, 12.1.2, and 12.1.3. The vulnerability resides in the Dialog Box functionality and allows remote attackers to compromise confidentiality and integrity without impacting availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.1= 12.1.2= 12.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oracle E-Business Suite installationQuery the database for the EBS release version using: SELECT release_name FROM fnd_product_groups; or check the $APPL_TOP/../admin/sql/adrelins.sql outputAffected if The version returned is 12.1.1, 12.1.2, or 12.1.3
-
Confirm CMRO module is installedQuery the FND_INSTALLATIONS table or check Oracle Applications Manager (OAM) for installed modules: SELECT product_version, status FROM fnd_product_installations WHERE product_code = 'CS';Affected if CMRO (Customer Support) module installation shows status as 'Installed' for versions 12.1.1-12.1.3
-
Verify Dialog Box functionality is in useCheck the CMRO configuration for active dialog box definitions: SELECT * FROM cs_dialogs WHERE enabled_flag = 'Y'; or inspect the CMRO responsibility configuration in Oracle FormsAffected if Dialog Box functionality is enabled (enabled_flag = 'Y') in the CMRO module
User is affected if running Oracle E-Business Suite versions 12.1.1, 12.1.2, or 12.1.3 with the CMRO module installed and Dialog Box functionality enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for April 2016 or later which contains the fix for this vulnerability. Organizations should also review Oracle's guidance for patching Oracle E-Business Suite and test thoroughly in a non-production environment before production deployment.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3456 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3456 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data