CVE-2016-3460
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM component in Oracle PeopleSoft Products 9.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to ePerformance.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCVE-2016-3460 is an unspecified vulnerability in PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM version 9.2's ePerformance component. It allows remote authenticated users to impact confidentiality and integrity, indicating potential unauthorized data access or modification. The medium CVSS score suggests the attack requires some level of sophistication or specific conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM versionAccess the PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM system via the web portal and navigate to the About page, or query the PeopleTools version table (PSSTATUS or similar) using SQL to determine the exact release version. Compare the version number to the affected range (9.2).Affected if The installed version is exactly 9.2
-
Confirm ePerformance component is enabledCheck the PeopleSoft Application Designer or web menu for the ePerformance module. In the PeopleSoft portal, navigate to Enterprise Components > Performance > ePerformance, or verify through the PeopleTools Security > Component Permissions to see if ePerformance components (such as GP_SS_SIGNIN, GP_SS_EE_SELF, or related) are registered and accessible.Affected if ePerformance components are present and accessible in the system
-
Verify user role assignments for ePerformanceUse PeopleSoft Security Administrator (PeopleTools > Security > User Profiles) or query the PSROLEUSER table to review which roles have access to ePerformance-related components. Check if roles like Employee Self-Service, Manager Self-Service, or Performance Manager are assigned to users.Affected if Roles granting ePerformance access are assigned to users, particularly to unaudited or external accounts
-
Review ePerformance web catalog and menu accessNavigate to PeopleTools > Portal > Structure and Content to examine the ePerformance folder structure and content references. Check which web libraries (such as GP_SS_RMT) and service operations are exposed in the ePerformance menu.Affected if ePerformance menus and web libraries are publicly accessible or not restricted to verified internal users
-
Inspect authentication and single sign-on configurationExamine the PeopleTools > Security > Signon Settings and any SSO configuration (such as LDAP or Kerberos integration). Verify that authentication is required for all ePerformance URLs and that session tokens are properly validated.Affected if ePerformance can be accessed without strong authentication or session validation is disabled
You are affected if your PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM is version 9.2 and the ePerformance component is enabled and accessible to authenticated users, as the vulnerability allows impact to confidentiality and integrity through the unspecified flaw in this component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Oracle Critical Patch Update that addresses this vulnerability (June 2016 CPU). Ensure ePerformance access is restricted to authenticated users with verified roles and monitor for unauthorized access patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3460 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3460 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data