CVE-2016-3616
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe cjpeg utility in libjpeg allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe cjpeg utility in libjpeg contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability when processing specially crafted JPEG files, which can cause a denial of service (application crash) or potentially allow arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.4= 8.0= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 18.10= 7.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the cjpeg utilityRun 'which cjpeg' or 'find /usr -name cjpeg 2>/dev/null' to find the cjpeg binary on the system.Affected if The cjpeg utility is present on the system.
-
Identify the installed libjpeg versionRun 'dpkg -l | grep libjpeg' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'rpm -qa | grep libjpeg' (RHEL) to list installed libjpeg packages and their versions.Affected if The displayed version matches an affected version: Libjpeg Turbo 7.4, or the library version is 7.4 on RHEL 8.0, or the library version is 8.0 on Debian 8.0, or Ubuntu versions 12.04, 14.04, 16.04, 18.04, or 18.04.
-
Check libjpeg-turbo version directlyRun 'cjpeg -version' if available, or check the shared library version with 'ldd $(which cjpeg) | grep jpeg' and then 'dpkg -l | grep <libraryname>' or 'rpm -qf <librarypath>'.Affected if The version number shown is 7.4.
-
Verify the specific package versionFor Ubuntu/Debian: 'apt-cache policy libjpeg-turbo' or 'apt-cache policy libjpeg62-turbo'. For RHEL: 'yum info libjpeg-turbo'.Affected if The installed version is 7.4.
A system is affected if it has the cjpeg utility present AND the installed libjpeg version matches 7.4 (for Libjpeg Turbo or RHEL) or 8.0 (for Debian), or is one of the listed Ubuntu versions that shipped with the vulnerable library version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate libjpeg to the patched version that addresses this vulnerability, and avoid processing untrusted or unknown JPEG files with the cjpeg utility until the update is applied.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3616 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data