CVE-2016-3737
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe server in Red Hat JBoss Operations Network (JON) before 3.3.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP request, related to message deserialization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JBoss Operations Network server before version 3.3.6 is vulnerable to unsafe deserialization of incoming HTTP message data. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted HTTP request containing malicious serialized Java objects that, when processed by the server's deserialization routine, execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify JBoss Operations Network is installedLocate the JBoss Operations Network installation by searching for the 'jboss-on' or 'jon' directories in common installation paths such as /opt, /usr/local, or the application's root directory. Check for the presence of the 'server' and 'bin' subdirectories typical of JBoss installations.Affected if The software is not present on the system, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Identify the installed versionCheck the version file or startup scripts within the installation directory. Look for a version manifest, a 'version.txt' file, or examine the startup logs that typically display the server version on initialization.Affected if The version cannot be determined or the detected version is 3.3.5 or lower.
-
Confirm the HTTP management interface is exposedInspect the server configuration files (typically in the 'server' subdirectory) to determine if the HTTP-based management endpoint is enabled and bound to a network-accessible IP address. Check for 'http' connector definitions in the configuration.Affected if The HTTP interface is enabled and reachable over the network, making deserialization input possible.
-
Check network accessibility of the HTTP serviceUse network scanning tools (such as netstat, nmap, or ss) to verify if the JBoss HTTP port (commonly port 8080 or 8443) is listening on an externally accessible IP address rather than localhost only.Affected if The HTTP service is bound to 0.0.0.0 or a public IP address, allowing remote attackers to send malicious requests.
A system is affected if JBoss Operations Network version 3.3.5 or earlier is installed with the HTTP interface enabled and network-accessible, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to deliver malicious serialized Java objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade JBoss Operations Network to version 3.3.6 or later. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, implement network segmentation to limit exposure and deploy WAF rules to block HTTP requests containing known Java deserialization attack patterns.
JBoss Operations Network 3.3.6
- 1. Backup the current JBoss Operations Network installation and database before proceeding.
- 2. Download JBoss Operations Network 3.3.6 from the official Red Hat download channel (RHN or Red Hat customer portal).
- 3. Stop the JBoss Operations Network server services.
- 4. Follow the official upgrade documentation to install version 3.3.6, preserving configuration files where appropriate.
- 5. Start the JBoss Operations Network server services.
- 6. Verify the server is running correctly and all plugins/agents can connect.
- 7. Validate that the vulnerability is remediated by confirming the server responds normally to legitimate requests.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3737 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data