GoApplication · Golang

CVE-2016-3959

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-05-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.5 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Verify function in crypto/dsa/dsa.go in Go before 1.5.4 and 1.6.x before 1.6.1 does not properly check parameters passed to the big integer library, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted public key to a program that uses HTTPS client certificates or SSH server libraries.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The DSAVerify function in Go's crypto/dsa package fails to properly validate parameters before passing them to the big integer library, allowing a maliciously crafted DSA public key to trigger an infinite loop, causing denial of service in applications using HTTPS client certificates or SSH server libraries.

MitigationUpgrade Go to version 1.6.1 or later (or 1.5.4+ for the 1.5.x branch) and recompile all affected binaries that use crypto/dsa for certificate validation or SSH operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GoApplication
Affected:= 1.6<= 1.5
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 22= 23= 24
LeapOperating system
Affected:= 42.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine the installed Go version
    Run 'go version' or check /usr/local/go/VERSION for the Go toolchain, or inspect the binary with 'binaryname --version' if it's a distributed application
    Affected if The version shown is 1.6.0 or any 1.5.x release (1.5 through 1.5.x)
  2. Identify applications using crypto/dsa
    Search application source code for 'import crypto/dsa' or review compiled binary imports using tools like 'go tool nm' or 'objdump'
    Affected if The application imports and uses the crypto/dsa package for DSA verification
  3. Check if HTTPS client certificate validation is in use
    Review application configuration and code for TLS client authentication (client certificates), which relies on crypto/dsa for certificate validation
    Affected if The application validates DSA-based client certificates in TLS connections
  4. Check if SSH server functionality is in use
    Review application for SSH server implementation (look for ssh.ListenAndServe or similar SSH library usage)
    Affected if The application runs an SSH server using DSA keys for authentication
  5. Verify the operating system version
    Run 'cat /etc/os-release' (Fedora) or 'cat /etc/SuSE-release' (openSUSE) to determine the OS version
    Affected if Running Fedora 22, 23, or 24, or openSUSE Leap 42.1, which ship with vulnerable Go versions

You are affected if your Go version is 1.6.0 or any 1.5.x release AND your application uses crypto/dsa for certificate validation or SSH operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Go to version 1.6.1 or later (or 1.5.4+ for the 1.5.x branch) and recompile all affected binaries that use crypto/dsa for certificate validation or SSH operations.

Fix this in Go Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3959 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data