CVE-2016-4436
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Struts 2 before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to improper action name clean up.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApache Struts 2 versions before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 contain a vulnerability related to improper action name cleanup. The CVSS 9.8 critical score indicates potential for remote code execution, though the specific exploitation mechanism is not detailed in the available description.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.0.4= 2.0.5= 2.0.6= 2.0.7= 2.0.8= 2.0.9= 2.0.11= 2.0.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Struts 2 core librarySearch for struts2-core-*.jar files in your application deployment directory, typically under WEB-INF/lib/ or in the application's classpath. The filename contains the version number (e.g., struts2-core-2.3.24.jar).Affected if The file is not found, indicating Struts 2 may not be present.
-
Extract the exact Struts 2 versionIf using Maven, check pom.xml for the struts2-core dependency version. If the JAR is available, inspect its manifest file (META-INF/MANIFEST.MF) for the Implementation-Version attribute.Affected if Unable to determine the version from available files.
-
Compare against affected version rangesThe affected versions are: any 2.x version before 2.3.29, or any 2.5.x version before 2.5.1. Compare your identified version to these boundaries. Note: Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.11.1 are explicitly listed as affected.Affected if Your version is 2.3.28 or lower in the 2.3.x line, OR 2.5.0 in the 2.5.x line, OR any 2.0.x version up to 2.0.11.1.
-
Confirm the application uses Struts 2 action processingCheck your struts.xml configuration file (typically in WEB-INF/classes/) and verify that Struts 2 action mappings are defined. Also verify the web.xml contains the StrutsPrepareAndExecuteFilter or FilterDispatcher filter configuration.Affected if Struts 2 filter is not configured in web.xml or no struts.xml exists, indicating Struts 2 is not actively used.
You are affected if your deployed Apache Struts 2 version is any release before 2.3.29 in the 2.3.x series, or any release before 2.5.1 in the 2.5.x series, and your application uses the Struts 2 framework for request processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apache Struts 2 installations to version 2.3.29 or later, or 2.5.1 or later, to remediate this vulnerability.
Struts 2.3.29 (for 2.3.x users) or Struts 2.5.1+ (for 2.5.x users)
- 1. Identify the current Struts 2 version in use by checking project dependencies (pom.xml, build.gradle, or WAR file lib directory)
- 2. If using Struts 2.3.x branch, upgrade to Struts 2.3.29
- 3. If using Struts 2.5.x branch, upgrade to Struts 2.5.1 or later (recommend latest 2.5.x stable release)
- 4. Update the Struts version in your build configuration file (pom.xml, build.gradle, or equivalent)
- 5. Rebuild and test the application thoroughly, especially action mappings and results
- 6. Deploy the updated application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4436 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4436 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data