CVE-2016-4464
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe application plugins in Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.x before 1.2.3 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 do not match SAML AudienceRestriction values against configured audience URIs, which might allow remote attackers to have bypass intended restrictions and have unspecified other impact via a crafted SAML token with a trusted signature.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Apache CXF Fediz application plugins fail to validate the SAML AudienceRestriction element against configured audience URIs. This allows attackers with a validly signed SAML token from a trusted Identity Provider to bypass audience restrictions and access services not intended for them, as the plugin does not verify that the SAML token was issued for the correct service recipient.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.2.0= 1.2.1= 1.2.2= 1.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Apache CXF Fediz installationSearch for Fediz JAR files (fediz-*.jar) in your application server's lib directory, webapp folders, or check your Maven/Gradle dependencies for org.apache.cxf.fediz groupIdAffected if Fediz libraries are present in your environment and used for SAML or WS-Federation authentication
-
Identify the Fediz versionCheck the version of the fediz-core or fediz-tools JAR file (typically found in META-INF/MANIFEST.MF inside the JAR, or in your build dependency declaration)Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, or 1.3.0
-
Determine if SAML authentication is configuredExamine your Fediz configuration XML file (usually named fediz-config.xml or located in WEB-INF/fediz-config.xml) and look for a <protocol> element set to SAMLAffected if The protocol is configured as SAML (urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion) rather than WS-Federation
-
Verify audience restriction configuration existsIn the Fediz configuration file, check for an <audienceUri> element within the <realm> or <application> section, which defines expected service recipients for SAML tokensAffected if An audience URI is configured, indicating audience validation should be enforced but is not performed due to the bug
You are affected if you are running Fediz version 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, or 1.3.0 with SAML-based authentication configured, regardless of whether audience URIs are explicitly defined in your configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Apache CXF Fediz to version 1.2.3 or later (for 1.2.x) or 1.3.1 or later (for 1.3.x). After upgrading, verify that SAML audience restrictions are now properly enforced by testing with tokens having incorrect audience values.
Upgrade to Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.3 or 1.3.1 (or later)
- Identify the current version of Apache CXF Fediz in use (1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, or 1.3.0)
- Stop the affected service or application
- Backup the current configuration and deployment
- Download Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.3 or 1.3.1 (or a later stable release) from the official Apache CXF distribution
- Replace the existing CXF Fediz libraries with the new version
- Review and update any custom configurations if needed for compatibility with the new version
- Restart the service or application
- Verify the SAML AudienceRestriction validation is working correctly by testing with both valid and crafted SAML tokens
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,824.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4464 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4464 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data