OpenstackApplication · Redhat

CVE-2016-4474

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The image build process for the overcloud images in Red Hat OpenStack Platform 8.0 (Liberty) director and Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 7.0 (Kilo) director (aka overcloud-full) use a default root password of ROOTPW, which allows attackers to gain access via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The overcloud image build process for Red Hat OpenStack Platform 8.0 (Liberty) director and 7.0 (Kilo) director embeds a hardcoded default root password 'ROOTPW' into the overcloud-full image. Attackers with knowledge of this default credential can gain root access to any deployed overcloud instance using this predictable password.

MitigationRegenerate overcloud images with a unique, strong root password and redeploy, or immediately change the root password on all affected overcloud nodes using a secure, unique password.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenstackApplication
Affected:= 7.0= 8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenStack Platform director version
    Run 'openstack --version' or check the undercloud configuration at /etc/undercloud.conf for the version. Alternatively, check the RPM package: rpm -qa | grep -i openstack
    Affected if Version is 7.0 (Kilo) or 8.0 (Liberty) director
  2. Confirm overcloud deployment exists
    Check for overcloud node existence: 'openstack server list' or 'nova list' to list deployed instances. Also verify the overcloud-full image was used by checking the image list: 'openstack image list'
    Affected if Overcloud instances exist or overcloud-full images are present in the image catalog
  3. Check root password on overcloud nodes
    Access an overcloud node console or SSH, then run 'sudo cat /etc/shadow' to view the root password hash, or use 'sudo passwd -S root' to check password status. Compare the root password against the hardcoded default 'ROOTPW'
    Affected if The root password hash corresponds to the hardcoded default 'ROOTPW' or root login is possible using password 'ROOTPW'
  4. Verify image build source for hardcoded password
    If you built custom overcloud images, inspect the image build logs or scripts (e.g., in /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-common/image* or tripleo-heat-templates) for the string 'ROOTPW' embedded in the build process
    Affected if Image build scripts contain the hardcoded string 'ROOTPW' as the root password

You are affected if you deployed overcloud instances using Red Hat OpenStack Platform 7.0 or 8.0 director and the root password on those nodes matches the hardcoded default 'ROOTPW'.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Regenerate overcloud images with a unique, strong root password and redeploy, or immediately change the root password on all affected overcloud nodes using a secure, unique password.

Fix this in Openstack Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4474 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data