CurlApplication · Haxx

CVE-2016-4802

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-06-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.49.0 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in cURL and libcurl before 7.49.1, when built with SSPI or telnet is enabled, allow local users to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse (1) security.dll, (2) secur32.dll, or (3) ws2_32.dll in the application or current working directory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

cURL and libcurl before 7.49.1, when built with SSPI or telnet support, suffer from DLL hijacking vulnerabilities. The application loads DLLs (security.dll, secur32.dll, ws2_32.dll) using relative paths from the current working directory or application directory without secure search path ordering. Local attackers can place malicious DLLs with these names in directories where the application runs, causing arbitrary code execution upon DLL injection.

MitigationUpgrade cURL/libcurl to version 7.49.1 or later which includes the security fix. If upgrade is not feasible, ensure the application directory and any directory added to the search path are not writable by untrusted users, or rebuild curl without telnet/SSPI support if those features are unnecessary.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CurlApplication
Affected:<= 7.49.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the installed cURL version
    Run 'curl --version' or check libcurl version programmatically
    Affected if The version reported is 7.49.0 or earlier (any version <= 7.49.0)
  2. Confirm Windows platform
    Verify the operating system is Windows - DLL hijacking via relative path loading is Windows-specific
    Affected if Running on Windows (Linux/macOS are not affected by this specific DLL hijacking flaw)
  3. Determine if SSPI or telnet support is enabled
    Run 'curl --version' and examine the feature list for 'SSPI' or 'telnet' keywords, or check the build configuration if available
    Affected if The build includes SSPI or telnet support - these features enable the vulnerable DLL loading behavior
  4. Inspect current working directory for suspicious DLLs
    List all DLL files in the directory where curl will execute (ls *.dll on Windows or dir *.dll), specifically looking for security.dll, secur32.dll, or ws2_32.dll
    Affected if Any of the files security.dll, secur32.dll, or ws2_32.dll exist in the execution directory - these could be malicious DLLs injected by an attacker
  5. Check application directory for vulnerable DLLs
    List DLLs in the directory where curl.exe or the application using libcurl resides
    Affected if security.dll, secur32.dll, or ws2_32.dll are present in the application directory

A user is affected if they are running cURL/libcurl version 7.49.0 or earlier on Windows with SSPI or telnet support enabled, and malicious DLLs exist in directories from which the application loads DLLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.49.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade cURL/libcurl to version 7.49.1 or later which includes the security fix. If upgrade is not feasible, ensure the application directory and any directory added to the search path are not writable by untrusted users, or rebuild curl without telnet/SSPI support if those features are unnecessary.

Fix this in Curl Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4802 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4802 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data